443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24635372)
1. Temporal trends and morbidities of vacuum, forceps, and combined use of both.
Fong A; Wu E; Pan D; Chung JH; Ogunyemi DA
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1886-91. PubMed ID: 24635372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
Gardella C; Taylor M; Benedetti T; Hitti J; Critchlow C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of outcomes between operative vaginal deliveries and spontaneous vaginal deliveries in southeast Nigeria.
Lawani LO; Anozie OB; Ezeonu PO; Iyoke CA
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 24717812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity After Attempted Operative Vaginal Delivery According to Fetal Head Station.
Ducarme G; Hamel JF; Bouet PE; Legendre G; Vandenbroucke L; Sentilhes L
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 126(3):521-529. PubMed ID: 26244539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
Johnson JH; Figueroa R; Garry D; Elimian A; Maulik D
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
Caughey AB; Sandberg PL; Zlatnik MG; Thiet MP; Parer JT; Laros RK
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):908-12. PubMed ID: 16260505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events.
Bailit JL; Grobman WA; Rice MM; Wapner RJ; Reddy UM; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Caritis SN; Iams JD; Saade G; Rouse DJ; Tolosa JE;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):638.e1-638.e10. PubMed ID: 26596236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increasing rates of operative vaginal delivery across two decades: accompanying outcomes and instrument preferences.
Hehir MP; Reidy FR; Wilkinson MN; Mahony R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Nov; 171(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 23998554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station.
Muraca GM; Sabr Y; Lisonkova S; Skoll A; Brant R; Cundiff GW; Joseph KS
CMAJ; 2017 Jun; 189(22):E764-E772. PubMed ID: 28584040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Operative vaginal deliveries and their impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes - prospective analysis.
Morávková P; Hruban L; Jančářová D; Janků P; Gerychová R; Vinklerová P; Štěpánová R; Ventruba P
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(2):93-98. PubMed ID: 31238678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Forceps and Vacuum Delivery at Outlet, Low, and Midpelvic Station.
Muraca GM; Sabr Y; Lisonkova S; Skoll A; Brant R; Cundiff GW; Joseph KS
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Mar; 41(3):327-337. PubMed ID: 30366887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations.
Dandolu V; Chatwani A; Harmanli O; Floro C; Gaughan JP; Hernandez E
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2005; 16(4):304-7. PubMed ID: 15809773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparing fetal and maternal morbidities between operative deliveries by Teissier's spatulas and Minicup vacuum extractor].
Aouar Z; Ramanah R; Mangin M; Leung F; Mulin B; Courtois L; Cossa S; Maillet R; Riethmuller D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Dec; 38(8):642-7. PubMed ID: 19892474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Operative vaginal delivery: current trends in obstetrics.
Goetzinger KR; Macones GA
Womens Health (Lond); 2008 May; 4(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 19072477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.
Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Kanarek KS
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):789-94. PubMed ID: 1923198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps.
Sainz JA; García-Mejido JA; Aquise A; Borrero C; Bonomi MJ; Fernández-Palacín A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):193.e1-193.e12. PubMed ID: 30391443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in operative vaginal delivery rates and associated maternal complication rates in an inner-city hospital.
Kabiru WN; Jamieson D; Graves W; Lindsay M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 184(6):1112-4. PubMed ID: 11349172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
