These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

571 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24635453)

  • 1. Validation and simplification of Fournier's gangrene severity index.
    Lin TY; Ou CH; Tzai TS; Tong YC; Chang CC; Cheng HL; Yang WH; Lin YM
    Int J Urol; 2014 Jul; 21(7):696-701. PubMed ID: 24635453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Fournier's gangrene severity index in a large contemporary series.
    Corcoran AT; Smaldone MC; Gibbons EP; Walsh TJ; Davies BJ
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):944-8. PubMed ID: 18635215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporating Simplified Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index with early surgical intervention can maximize survival in high-risk Fournier's gangrene patients.
    Lin TY; Cheng IH; Ou CH; Tsai YS; Tong YC; Cheng HL; Yang WH; Lin YM; Cheng YS
    Int J Urol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):737-743. PubMed ID: 31001902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fournier's gangrene: experience with 25 patients and use of Fournier's gangrene severity index score.
    Yeniyol CO; Suelozgen T; Arslan M; Ayder AR
    Urology; 2004 Aug; 64(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 15302463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there a need for the Fournier's gangrene severity index? Comparison of scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with Fournier's gangrene.
    Roghmann F; von Bodman C; Löppenberg B; Hinkel A; Palisaar J; Noldus J
    BJU Int; 2012 Nov; 110(9):1359-65. PubMed ID: 22494217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evaluation of microbiology and Fournier's gangrene severity index in 27 patients.
    Uluğ M; Gedik E; Girgin S; Celen MK; Ayaz C
    Int J Infect Dis; 2009 Nov; 13(6):e424-30. PubMed ID: 19411184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of different scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with Fournier's gangrene: experience with 50 patients.
    Tuncel A; Keten T; Aslan Y; Kayali M; Erkan A; Koseoglu E; Atan A
    Scand J Urol; 2014 Aug; 48(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 24521184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fournier's gangrene: Three years of experience with 20 patients and validity of the Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index Score.
    Tuncel A; Aydin O; Tekdogan U; Nalcacioglu V; Capar Y; Atan A
    Eur Urol; 2006 Oct; 50(4):838-43. PubMed ID: 16513250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neutrophil to Lymphocyte and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratios Are More Effective than the Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index for Predicting Poor Prognosis in Fournier's Gangrene.
    Yim SU; Kim SW; Ahn JH; Cho YH; Chung H; Hwang EC; Yu HS; Oh KJ; Kim SO; Jung SI; Kang TW; Kwon DD; Park K
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2016 Apr; 17(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 26835748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting mortality of Fournier's gangrene: review of 70 patients.
    Ersay A; Yilmaz G; Akgun Y; Celik Y
    ANZ J Surg; 2007; 77(1-2):43-8. PubMed ID: 17295820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome prediction in patients with Fournier's gangrene.
    Laor E; Palmer LS; Tolia BM; Reid RE; Winter HI
    J Urol; 1995 Jul; 154(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 7776464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is Fournier's gangrene severity index useful for predicting outcome of Fournier's gangrene?
    Lin E; Yang S; Chiu AW; Chow YC; Chen M; Lin WC; Chang HK; Hsu JM; Lo KY; Hsu HH
    Urol Int; 2005; 75(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 16123564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fournier's Gangrene: clinical case review and analysis of risk factors for mortality.
    You Q; Guan J; Wu B; Du J; Miao Y; Bai X; Ma Y; Zhen S; He Z
    BMC Surg; 2024 Sep; 24(1):251. PubMed ID: 39251993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fournier's gangrene: a model for early prediction.
    Palvolgyi R; Kaji AH; Valeriano J; Plurad D; Rajfer J; de Virgilio C
    Am Surg; 2014 Oct; 80(10):926-31. PubMed ID: 25264631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fournier's gangrene : what are the prognostic factors? Our experience with 40 patients.
    Sallami S; Maalla R; Gammoudi A; Ben Jdidia G; Tarhouni L; Horchani A
    Tunis Med; 2012 Oct; 90(10):708-14. PubMed ID: 23096511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of surgical intervention timing on the case fatality rate for Fournier's gangrene: an analysis of 379 cases.
    Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Horiguchi H; Fujimura T; Ohe K; Matsuda S; Fushimi K; Homma Y
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E1096-100. PubMed ID: 22726768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors for mortality in fournier's gangrene in a general hospital: use of simplified founier gangrene severe index score (SFGSI).
    Tenório CEL; Lima SVC; Albuquerque AV; Cavalcanti MP; Teles F
    Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28853819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Different scoring systems to evaluate the prognosis of Fournier's gangrene: A comparative study].
    Zhu XD; Ding F; Wang GD; Shao Q
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Aug; 21(8):720-3. PubMed ID: 26442300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fournier's gangrene: an analysis of 80 patients and a novel scoring system.
    Yilmazlar T; Ozturk E; Ozguc H; Ercan I; Vuruskan H; Oktay B
    Tech Coloproctol; 2010 Sep; 14(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 20559857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A different perspective for morbidity related to Fournier's gangrene: which scoring system is more reliable to predict requirement of skin graft and flaps in survivors of Fournier's gangrene?
    Selvi I; Aykac A; Baran O; Burlukkara S; Ozok U; Sunay MM
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Aug; 51(8):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 31177367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.