These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24635469)

  • 1. The University of British Columbia.
    Klein MC
    Birth; 2013 Jun; 40(2):143-5. PubMed ID: 24635469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section.
    Todumrong N; Somprasit C; Tanprasertkul C; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jul; 99 Suppl 4():S37-41. PubMed ID: 29916674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maternal and fetal outcomes following unplanned conversion to general anesthetic at elective cesarean section.
    Aiken CE; Aiken AR; Cole JC; Brockelsby JC; Bamber JH
    J Perinatol; 2015 Sep; 35(9):695-9. PubMed ID: 26067473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theory of obstetrics: an epidemiologic framework for justifying medically indicated early delivery.
    Joseph KS
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Mar; 7():4. PubMed ID: 17391525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time to subsequent live birth according to mode of delivery in the first birth.
    O'Neill SM; Khashan AS; Kenny LC; Kearney PM; Mortensen PB; Greene RA; Agerbo E; Uldbjerg N; Henriksen TB
    BJOG; 2015 Aug; 122(9):1207-15. PubMed ID: 25825045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
    Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elective cesarean delivery at 38 and 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal risks.
    Glavind J; Uldbjerg N
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 27(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 25689238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case-control study.
    Karlström A; Lindgren H; Hildingsson I
    BJOG; 2013 Mar; 120(4):479-86; discussion 486. PubMed ID: 23316937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cesarean sections in the Centre-Val de Loire region: Practices and indications-the Robson Classification].
    Lecuyer AI; Baron S; Diguisto C; Laurent E; Turpin D; Potin J; Grammatico-Guillon L
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2020 Aug; 68(4):253-259. PubMed ID: 32591237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Birth after a previous cesarean section - what is most important in making a decision?
    Micek M; Kosinska-Kaczynska K; Godek B; Krowicka M; Szymusik I; Wielgos M
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2014; 35(8):718-23. PubMed ID: 25702301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elective induction of labour: the problem of interpretation and communication of risks.
    Cheyne H; Abhyankar P; Williams B
    Midwifery; 2012 Aug; 28(4):352-5. PubMed ID: 22776569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Planned Mode of Delivery in Women with Advanced Maternal Age.
    Lavecchia M; Sabbah M; Abenhaim HA
    Matern Child Health J; 2016 Nov; 20(11):2318-2327. PubMed ID: 27473092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
    Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The case against elective cesarean section.
    Goer H
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2001 Dec; 15(3):23-38; quiz 89. PubMed ID: 11785576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maternal outcomes of cesarean sections: do generalists' patients have different outcomes than specialists' patients?
    Aubrey-Bassler K; Newbery S; Kelly L; Weaver B; Wilson S
    Can Fam Physician; 2007 Dec; 53(12):2132-8. PubMed ID: 18077752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elective caesarean section for breech presentation in first pregnancy and subsequent mode of labour.
    Khaskheli MN; Baloch S; Sheeba A
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 May; 24(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 24848389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Operative deliveries in low-risk pregnancies in The Netherlands: primary versus secondary care.
    Maassen MS; Hendrix MJ; Van Vugt HC; Veersema S; Smits F; Nijhuis JG
    Birth; 2008 Dec; 35(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 19036039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrapartum management of twin pregnancies: are uncomplicated monochorionic pregnancies more at risk of complications than dichorionic pregnancies?
    Garabedian C; Poulain C; Duhamel A; Subtil D; Houfflin-Debarge V; Deruelle P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Mar; 94(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 25494703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Term elective induction of labour and perinatal outcomes in obese women: retrospective cohort study.
    Lee VR; Darney BG; Snowden JM; Main EK; Gilbert W; Chung J; Caughey AB
    BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 26840780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population.
    Bodner K; Wierrani F; Grünberger W; Bodner-Adler B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1193-8. PubMed ID: 20505947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.