These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2463577)
1. Reduction of energy required for defibrillation by delivering shocks in orthogonal directions in the dog. Bardou AL; Degonde J; Birkui PJ; Auger P; Chesnais JM; Duriez M Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1990-5. PubMed ID: 2463577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of multiple shocks on canine cardiac defibrillation. Flaker G; Schuder J; McDaniel W Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 1):1580-4. PubMed ID: 1704508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Double and triple sequential shocks reduce ventricular defibrillation threshold in dogs with and without myocardial infarction. Chang MS; Inoue H; Kallok MJ; Zipes DP J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Dec; 8(6):1393-405. PubMed ID: 3782643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical efficacy of shock waveforms and lead configurations for defibrillation. Jung W; Manz M; Moosdorf R; Spehl S; Wolpert C; Korte T; Lüderitz B Am Heart J; 1994 Apr; 127(4 Pt 2):985-93. PubMed ID: 8160603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defibrillation current and impedance are determinants of defibrillation energy requirements. Dorian P; Wang MJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1996-2001. PubMed ID: 2463578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biphasic versus sequential pulse defibrillation: a direct comparison in pigs. Jones DL; Klein GJ; Wood GK Am Heart J; 1992 Jul; 124(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 1615834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a new defibrillation pathway--the tongue-epigastric route. I. Experimental studies in dogs. Kerber RE; Hoyt R; Aronson A; Kieso R; Melton J J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Nov; 2(5):966-72. PubMed ID: 6630773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Truncated biphasic pulses for transthoracic defibrillation. Bardy GH; Gliner BE; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Jones GK; Anderson J; Troutman C; Johnson G Circulation; 1995 Mar; 91(6):1768-74. PubMed ID: 7882486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of duration of ventricular fibrillation on defibrillation efficacy in humans. Winkle RA; Mead RH; Ruder MA; Smith NA; Buch WS; Gaudiani VA Circulation; 1990 May; 81(5):1477-81. PubMed ID: 2331763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rapidly switching multidirectional defibrillation: reversal of ventricular fibrillation with lower energy shocks. Viana MA; Bassani RA; Petrucci O; Marques DA; Bassani JW J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Dec; 148(6):3213-8. PubMed ID: 25173125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of biphasic and monophasic pulses: does the advantage of biphasic shocks depend on the waveshape? Natale A; Sra J; Krum D; Dhala A; Deshpande S; Jazayeri M; Axtell K; Degroot P; VanHout WL; Akhtar M Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jul; 18(7):1354-61. PubMed ID: 7567587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Swerdlow CD; Ahern T; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Chen PS J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 27(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 8609329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transthoracic defibrillation: effect of dual-pathway sequential pulse shocks and single-pathway biphasic pulse shocks in a canine model. Scott BD; Kallok MJ; Birkett C; Kieso RA; Kerber RE Am Heart J; 1993 Jan; 125(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 8417549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation. Dalzell GW; Adgey AA Br Heart J; 1991 Jun; 65(6):311-6. PubMed ID: 2054239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of an unsuccessful subthreshold shock on the energy requirement for the subsequent defibrillation. Murakawa Y; Gliner BE; Shankar B; Thakor NV Am Heart J; 1989 May; 117(5):1065-9. PubMed ID: 2711966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selecting the transthoracic defibrillation shock directional vector based on VF amplitude improves shock success. Brooks L; Zhang Y; Dendi R; Anderson RH; Zimmerman B; Kerber RE J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1032-8. PubMed ID: 19460079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Successful reduction of a high defibrillation threshold by a combined implantation of a subcutaneous array and azygos vein lead. Yamada T; Robertson PG; McElderry HT; Doppalapudi H; Plumb VJ; Kay GN Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Jun; 35(6):e173-6. PubMed ID: 22360586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]