208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24636401)
1. A novel "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improves outcomes in poor responders.
Cakmak H; Tran ND; Zamah AM; Cedars MI; Rosen MP
Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1308-14. PubMed ID: 24636401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improve the pregnancy outcome in Bologna poor responders? a randomized clinical trial.
Ashrafi M; Arabipoor A; Yahyaei A; Zolfaghari Z; Ghaffari F
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2018 Dec; 16(1):124. PubMed ID: 30593268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Cumulative live birth rates per oocytes retrieved cycle: evaluation of clinical outcomes of IVF/ICSI].
Wu CX; Zhang T; Shu L; Huang J; Diao FY; Ding W; Gao Y; Wang W; Mao YD; Cui YG; Liu JY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):160-166. PubMed ID: 29609229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stop GnRH-Agonist Combined With Multiple-Dose GnRH-Antagonist Protocol for Patients With "Genuine" Poor Response Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for IVF.
Orvieto R; Kirshenbaum M; Galiano V; Elkan-Miller T; Zilberberg E; Haas J; Nahum R
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2020; 11():182. PubMed ID: 32528403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cumulative Live Birth Rate and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone-Antagonist Protocol and Multiple Minimal Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders.
Liu Y; Su R; Wu Y
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2020; 11():605939. PubMed ID: 33519714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare-up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation.
Malmusi S; La Marca A; Giulini S; Xella S; Tagliasacchi D; Marsella T; Volpe A
Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):402-6. PubMed ID: 16084881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fixed Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol
Dong M; Sun L; Huang L; Wang F; Zhang X; Liu F
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():690575. PubMed ID: 34867773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the modified natural in vitro fertilization cycle justified in patients with "genuine" poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?
Kedem A; Tsur A; Haas J; Yerushalmi GM; Hourvitz A; Machtinger R; Orvieto R
Fertil Steril; 2014 Jun; 101(6):1624-8. PubMed ID: 24680364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flexibility in starting ovarian stimulation at different phases of the menstrual cycle for treatment of infertile women with the use of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Qin N; Chen Q; Hong Q; Cai R; Gao H; Wang Y; Sun L; Zhang S; Guo H; Fu Y; Ai A; Tian H; Lyu Q; Daya S; Kuang Y
Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):334-341.e1. PubMed ID: 27114329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Live birth rates after modified natural cycle compared with high-dose FSH stimulation using GnRH antagonists in poor responders.
Lainas TG; Sfontouris IA; Venetis CA; Lainas GT; Zorzovilis IZ; Tarlatzis BC; Kolibianakis EM
Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 26307091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Delayed Start Versus Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders Pretreated With Estradiol in Luteal Phase: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Maged AM; Nada AM; Abohamila F; Hashem AT; Mostafa WA; Elzayat AR
Reprod Sci; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1627-31. PubMed ID: 26045549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does the time interval between antimüllerian hormone serum sampling and initiation of ovarian stimulation affect its predictive ability in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist? A retrospective single-center study.
Polyzos NP; Nelson SM; Stoop D; Nwoye M; Humaidan P; Anckaert E; Devroey P; Tournaye H
Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):438-44. PubMed ID: 23602319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of estrogen priming through luteal phase and stimulation phase in poor responders in in-vitro fertilization.
Chang EM; Han JE; Won HJ; Kim YS; Yoon TK; Lee WS
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2012 Mar; 29(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 22160464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer treatment compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study.
Wei LH; Ma WH; Tang N; Wei JH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 55(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 26927248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel protocol of ovulation induction with delayed gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration combined with high-dose recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and clomiphene citrate for poor responders and women over 35 years.
D'Amato G; Caroppo E; Pasquadibisceglie A; Carone D; Vitti A; Vizziello GM
Fertil Steril; 2004 Jun; 81(6):1572-7. PubMed ID: 15193479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In-vitro maturation of oocytes vs in-vitro fertilization with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: can superiority be defined?
Shavit T; Ellenbogen A; Michaeli M; Kartchovsky E; Ruzov O; Shalom-Paz E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Aug; 179():46-50. PubMed ID: 24965979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol.
Hohmann FP; Macklon NS; Fauser BC
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2003 Jan; 88(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 12519847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized controlled trial of increasing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone after initiating a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.
Propst AM; Bates GW; Robinson RD; Arthur NJ; Martin JE; Neal GS
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 16753156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of the delayed start antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in Bologna poor ovarian responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang S; Liu N; Li Y; Zhang L; Yue R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Feb; 303(2):347-362. PubMed ID: 33236173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Initiation of ovarian stimulation independent of the menstrual cycle: a case-control study.
Buendgen NK; Schultze-Mosgau A; Cordes T; Diedrich K; Griesinger G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Oct; 288(4):901-4. PubMed ID: 23545834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
