These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24636543)
21. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study). Louvard Y; Benamer H; Garot P; Hildick-Smith D; Loubeyre C; Rigattieri S; Monchi M; Lefèvre T; Hamon M; Am J Cardiol; 2004 Nov; 94(9):1177-80. PubMed ID: 15518616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes. Brasselet C; Blanpain T; Tassan-Mangina S; Deschildre A; Duval S; Vitry F; Gaillot-Petit N; Clément JP; Metz D Eur Heart J; 2008 Jan; 29(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 17999984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of transradial coronary catheterization on upper limb function. van Leeuwen MA; van Mieghem NM; Lenzen MJ; Selles RW; Hoefkens MF; Zijlstra F; van Royen N JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(4):515-23. PubMed ID: 25819177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transradial intervention versus transfemoral intervention accompanied with vascular closure device in acute myocardial infarction. Hwang HJ; Kwon SJ; Park CB; Kim DW; Yang IH; Lee HM; Cho JM; Park HY; Jin ES; Son IS; Kim CJ Int J Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 202():958-9. PubMed ID: 26547664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Efficacy and time-to-hemostasis of antegrade femoral access closure using the ExoSeal vascular closure device: a retrospective single-center study. Boschewitz JM; Pieper CC; Andersson M; Nadal J; Schild HH; Meyer C Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 48(5):585-91. PubMed ID: 25201516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Importance of a hydrophilic coronary wire in anatomically challenging transradial access: an extended case series. Aminian A; Dolatabadi D; Lalmand J J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 24(6):290-3. PubMed ID: 22684385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Severe catheter kinking and entrapment during transradial coronary angiography: percutaneous retrieval using a sheathless guide catheter. Aminian A; Fraser DG; Dolatabadi D Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 85(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 24740882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Rewriting the history of vascular closure devices. Dauerman HL EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):175-7. PubMed ID: 24952054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Coronary angiography via femoral and radial accesses in patients with extensive atherosclerosis]. Savchenko AP; Matchin IuG; Rudenko BA Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2002; (1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12715445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Coronary angiography by left radial approach. A bi-center prospective pilot study]. Guillard N; Lefèvre ; Spaulding C; Funck F; Py A; Chalet Y; Thebault B; Chauveau M; Guérin F Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1997 Oct; 90(10):1349-55. PubMed ID: 9539834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The choice of arterial access for percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on outcome: An expert opinion perspective. Baker NC; Ansel GM; Rao SV; Jolly SS; Pichard AD; Steinberg D; Lipinski MJ; Escarcega RO; Minha S; Lhermusier T; Magalhães MA; Waksman R Am Heart J; 2015 Jul; 170(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 26093860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of radiation dose to operator between transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography with optimised radiation protection: a phantom study. Liu H; Jin Z; Jing L Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 24162374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Design and rationale of the radial versus femoral access for coronary intervention (RIVAL) trial: a randomized comparison of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Jolly SS; Niemelä K; Xavier D; Widimsky P; Budaj A; Valentin V; Lewis BS; Avezum A; Steg PG; Rao SV; Cairns J; Chrolavicius S; Yusuf S; Mehta SR Am Heart J; 2011 Feb; 161(2):254-260.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21315206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Safety and efficacy of transulnar approach for coronary angiography and intervention. Li YZ; Zhou YJ; Zhao YX; Guo YH; Liu YY; Shi DM; Wang ZJ; Jia DA; Yang SW; Nie B; Han HY; Hu B Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Jul; 123(13):1774-9. PubMed ID: 20819645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cerebral microembolism during coronary angiography: a randomized comparison between femoral and radial arterial access. Jurga J; Nyman J; Tornvall P; Mannila MN; Svenarud P; van der Linden J; Sarkar N Stroke; 2011 May; 42(5):1475-7. PubMed ID: 21393589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Safety and efficacy of femoral artery closure with the FemoSeal(R) device after coronary angiography using a 7 French sheath. Wanitschek MM; Suessenbacher A; Dörler J; Pachinger O; Moes N; Alber HF Perfusion; 2011 Sep; 26(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 21712339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Transradial access and radiation exposure in diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures. Rigattieri S; Sciahbasi A; Drefahl S; Mussino E; Cera M; Di Russo C; Fedele S; Pugliese FR J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Sep; 26(9):469-74. PubMed ID: 25198491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Coronary angiography in the fully anticoagulated patient: the transradial route is successful and safe. Hildick-Smith DJ; Walsh JT; Lowe MD; Petch MC Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Jan; 58(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12508189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention. Jolly SS; Cairns J; Yusuf S; Niemela K; Steg PG; Worthley M; Ferrari E; Cantor WJ; Fung A; Valettas N; Rokoss M; Olivecrona GK; Widimsky P; Cheema AN; Gao P; Mehta SR; J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 63(10):954-63. PubMed ID: 24269362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]