These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24637251)

  • 1. Optical quality assessment in normal and forme fruste keratoconus eyes with a double-pass system: a comparison and variability study.
    Ye C; Ng PK; Jhanji V
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 98(11):1478-83. PubMed ID: 24637251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of Visual Quality in Eyes with Forme Fruste Keratoconus and Mild and Moderate Keratoconus Based on Optical Quality Analysis System II Parameters.
    Ren Z; Xu L; Fan Q; Yang K; Ren S; Zhao D
    J Ophthalmol; 2020; 2020():7505016. PubMed ID: 32280532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three-dimensional optical coherence tomography and combining a rotating Scheimpflug camera with a Placido topography system for forme fruste keratoconus diagnosis.
    Fukuda S; Beheregaray S; Hoshi S; Yamanari M; Lim Y; Hiraoka T; Yasuno Y; Oshika T
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 97(12):1554-9. PubMed ID: 24081501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Second-generation corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in normal, forme fruste keratoconic, and manifest keratoconic corneas after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors.
    Zhang L; Danesh J; Tannan A; Phan V; Yu F; Hamilton DR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2196-204. PubMed ID: 26703296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients.
    Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Ozulken K; Ozyol E; Akıncı A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23820305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus.
    Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J; Touboul D
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Wang YM; Chan TCY; Yu M; Jhanji V
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optical quality and intraocular scattering in a healthy young population.
    Martínez-Roda JA; Vilaseca M; Ondategui JC; Giner A; Burgos FJ; Cardona G; Pujol J
    Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Mar; 94(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 21083759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus.
    Awad EA; Abou Samra WA; Torky MA; El-Kannishy AM
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):186. PubMed ID: 28985735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Customized photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy using combined topographic and refractive data for myopia and astigmatism in eyes with forme fruste and mild keratoconus.
    Alpins N; Stamatelatos G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):591-602. PubMed ID: 17397730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Topography-guided surface ablation for forme fruste keratoconus.
    Koller T; Iseli HP; Donitzky C; Ing D; Papadopoulos N; Seiler T
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2198-202. PubMed ID: 17157132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of CorvisST biomechanical parameters and anterior segment optical coherence tomography for diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus.
    Shiga S; Kojima T; Nishida T; Nakamura T; Ichikawa K
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 99(6):644-651. PubMed ID: 33326180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeatability and reproducibility of a double-pass optical quality analysis device.
    Xu CC; Xue T; Wang QM; Zhou YN; Huang JH; Yu AY
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117587. PubMed ID: 25646846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
    Luz A; Lopes B; Hallahan KM; Valbon B; Fontes B; Schor P; Dupps WJ; Ambrósio R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 164():14-21. PubMed ID: 26743618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corneal thickness and elevation measurements using swept-source optical coherence tomography and slit scanning topography in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Jhanji V; Yang B; Yu M; Ye C; Leung CK
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 41(8):735-45. PubMed ID: 23566209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of optical quality and intraocular scattering after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation.
    Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Igarashi A; Kobashi H; Ishii R; Sato N
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 May; 53(6):3161-6. PubMed ID: 22661546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and repeatability of swept-source Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus.
    Szalai E; Berta A; Hassan Z; Módis L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 38(3):485-94. PubMed ID: 22261325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Yield of Display Modules of Corneal Tomography for Early Diagnosis of Corneal Ectasia.
    Vlasák O; Škorpíková J; Hlinomazová Z; Kalandrová V
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 74(5):175-183. PubMed ID: 31234630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of ocular biomechanics using dynamic ultra high-speed Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and normal eyes.
    Tian L; Ko MW; Wang LK; Zhang JY; Li TJ; Huang YF; Zheng YP
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 30(11):785-91. PubMed ID: 25291757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of ocular modulation transfer function determined by a ray-tracing aberrometer and a double-pass system in early cataract patients.
    Qiao L; Wan X; Cai X; Vasudevan B; Xiong Y; Tan J; Guan Z; Atchison DA; Wang N
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(19):3454-8. PubMed ID: 25269913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.