These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24637251)

  • 21. Enhanced Combined Tomography and Biomechanics Data for Distinguishing Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
    Luz A; Lopes B; Hallahan KM; Valbon B; Ramos I; Faria-Correia F; Schor P; Dupps WJ; Ambrósio R
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Jul; 32(7):479-94. PubMed ID: 27400080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of central corneal thickness in normal, keratoconus, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes using Scheimpflug imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and ultrasound pachymetry.
    Grewal DS; Brar GS; Grewal SP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 36(6):954-64. PubMed ID: 20494767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Repeatability of aberrometric measurements in normal and keratoconus eyes using a new Scheimpflug-Placido topographer.
    Bayhan HA; Aslan Bayhan S; Muhafız E; Can I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 24368115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of refractive correction on ocular optical quality measurement using double-pass system.
    Wan XH; Cai XG; Qiao LY; Zhang Y; Tan JX; Vishal J; Wang NL
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Nov; 126(22):4289-94. PubMed ID: 24238515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optical quality in central serous chorioretinopathy.
    Lee K; Sohn J; Choi JG; Chung SK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Dec; 55(12):8598-603. PubMed ID: 25468888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Corneal epithelial thickness analysis of forme fruste keratoconus with optical coherence tomography.
    Yang XL; Wang Y; Luo BG; Xu Y; Zhang XF
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2021; 14(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 33469489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screening of forme fruste keratoconus with the ocular response analyzer.
    Schweitzer C; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Colin J; Maurice-Tison S; Kerautret J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 May; 51(5):2403-10. PubMed ID: 19907025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differences in retinal images quality between normal and subclinical keratoconus and its association to posterior corneal asymmetry.
    Smadja D; Krauthammer M; Wajnsztajn D; Abulafia A; Zadok D; Lavy I
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2023 Jul; 33(4):1567-1575. PubMed ID: 37013367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability of Pentacam HR Thickness Maps of the Entire Cornea in Normal, Post-Laser In Situ Keratomileusis, and Keratoconus Eyes.
    Xu Z; Peng M; Jiang J; Yang C; Zhu W; Lu F; Shen M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 162():74-82.e1. PubMed ID: 26556008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Repeatability of measurements with a double-pass system.
    Saad A; Saab M; Gatinel D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 20117702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In-vivo corneal biomechanical analysis of unilateral keratoconus.
    Ayar O; Ozmen MC; Muftuoglu O; Akdemir MO; Koc M; Ozulken K
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(6):1141-5. PubMed ID: 26682162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of aging on optical quality and intraocular scattering using the double-pass instrument.
    Kamiya K; Umeda K; Kobashi H; Shimizu K; Kawamorita T; Uozato H
    Curr Eye Res; 2012 Oct; 37(10):884-8. PubMed ID: 22587340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Repeatability and reproducibility of a new optical biometer in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Yağcı R; Güler E; Kulak AE; Erdoğan BD; Balcı M; Hepşen İF
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Jan; 41(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 25532643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multifocal toric intraocular lens implantation for forme fruste and stable keratoconus.
    Montano M; López-Dorantes KP; Ramirez-Miranda A; Graue-Hernández EO; Navas A
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 30(4):282-5. PubMed ID: 24702581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Double-Pass Retina Point Imaging for the Evaluation of Optical Light Scatter, Retinal Image Quality, and Staging of Keratoconus.
    Leonard AP; Gardner SD; Rocha KM; Zeldin ER; Tremblay DM; Waring GO
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Nov; 32(11):760-765. PubMed ID: 27824380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Systematic Review of Subclinical Keratoconus and Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
    Henriquez MA; Hadid M; Izquierdo L
    J Refract Surg; 2020 Apr; 36(4):270-279. PubMed ID: 32267959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes.
    Prospero Ponce CM; Rocha KM; Smith SD; Krueger RR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1055-62. PubMed ID: 19465292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconus with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes.
    Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Velarde GC; Nosé W
    J Refract Surg; 2011 Mar; 27(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 20481414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intra-observer repeatability of optical quality measures provided by a double-pass system.
    Tomás J; Piñero DP; Alió JL
    Clin Exp Optom; 2012 Jan; 95(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 22022876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Corneal biomechanical properties and anterior segment parameters in forme fruste keratoconus.
    Kozobolis V; Sideroudi H; Giarmoukakis A; Gkika M; Labiris G
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(6):920-30. PubMed ID: 22865401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.