These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24637650)

  • 1. Evaluation of a new silicone adhesive tape among clinicians caring for patients with fragile or at-risk skin.
    Manriquez S; Loperfido B; Smith G
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Apr; 27(4):163-70. PubMed ID: 24637650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized and controlled comparison of gentleness of 2 medical adhesive tapes in healthy human subjects.
    Grove GL; Zerweck CR; Houser TP; Smith GE; Koski NI
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2013; 40(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 23202590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized comparison of a silicone tape and a paper tape for gentleness in healthy children.
    Grove GL; Zerweck CR; Ekholm BP; Smith GE; Koski NI
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 24240641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and efficacy of silicone tape for indwelling urinary catheter fixation in intensive care patients-A randomized clinical trial.
    de Paula FM; Frota OP; Ruiz JS; Braulio IC; do Nascimento Gonçalves FC; Ferreira-Júnior MA; Sonobe HM; Ferreira DN; Pompeo CM; de Sousa AFL
    Nurs Crit Care; 2024 Mar; 29(2):347-356. PubMed ID: 37264262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of binaural beat tapes for treatment of anxiety: a pilot study of tape preference and outcomes.
    Le Scouarnec RP; Poirier RM; Owens JE; Gauthier J; Taylor AG; Foresman PA
    Altern Ther Health Med; 2001 Jan; 7(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11191043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Medical Adhesive Tapes in Patients at Risk of Facial Skin Trauma under Anesthesia.
    Zeng LA; Lie SA; Chong SY
    Anesthesiol Res Pract; 2016; 2016():4878246. PubMed ID: 27382368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Medical Tape Performance Using Skin Response Quantitative Measurements on Healthy Volunteers.
    Turnbull MJ; Grigsby I; Unertl K; Sokol K; Nordby T; Liu C; Bailey A; Spiewak B; Smith G; McNulty AK
    Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56548. PubMed ID: 38646282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skin tapes and tissue adhesive vs. either method alone for laceration repair in a porcine model.
    Brown JL; Jehle D; Mayrose J; Schwartz L; Pugh J; O'Brien C
    Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 45():317-323. PubMed ID: 33059984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multicentre clinical evaluation of Cuticell Contact silicone wound contact layer in daily practice.
    Suess-Burghart A; Zomer K; Schwanke D
    Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Jun; Suppl Community Wound Care():S35-6, S38-41. PubMed ID: 26052993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A service evaluation of the use of silicone-based adhesive remover.
    Rudoni C
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Jan 24-Feb 13; 17(2):S4, S6, S8-9. PubMed ID: 18418930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of a thin absorbent skin adhesive dressing for wound management.
    Stephen-Haynes J; Callaghan R; Wibaux A; Johnson P; Carty N
    J Wound Care; 2014 Nov; 23(11):532, 534, 536 passim. PubMed ID: 25375401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of wound dressings with soft silicone adhesive technology.
    Morris C; Emsley P; Marland E; Meuleneire F; White R
    Paediatr Nurs; 2009 Apr; 21(3):38-43. PubMed ID: 19397129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation study of the properties of two adhesive foam dressings.
    Viamontes L; Jones AM
    Br J Nurs; 2003 Jun; 12(11 Suppl):S43-4, S46-9. PubMed ID: 12829978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of surgical tapes for wound closure.
    Rodeheaver GT; McLane M; West L; Edlich RF
    J Surg Res; 1985 Sep; 39(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 4033109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of adhesive surgical tape and wound dressings on the skin, with reference to skin stripping.
    Cutting KF
    J Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 17(4):157-8, 160-2. PubMed ID: 18494433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dressing spray enhances the adhesive strength of surgical dressing tapes.
    Sarifakioglu E; Sarifakioglu N
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2006; 72(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 17050929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical experience with an antimicrobial hydrogel dressing on recalcitrant wounds.
    Wood L; Wood Z; Davis P; Wilkins J
    J Wound Care; 2010 Jul; 19(7):287-8, 290-3. PubMed ID: 20616771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Infection prevention practices and the use of medical tapes.
    Bernatchez SF; Schommer K
    Am J Infect Control; 2021 Sep; 49(9):1177-1182. PubMed ID: 33766550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conformability and irritancy of adhesive tapes on the skin.
    Tokumura F; Ohyama K; Fujisawa H; Matsuda T; Kitazaki Y
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Oct; 37(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 9385512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
    Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.