These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24639820)

  • 41. Item analysis and optimizing multiple-choice questions for a viable question bank in ophthalmology: A cross-sectional study.
    Bhat SK; Prasad KHL
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 69(2):343-346. PubMed ID: 33463588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Multiple choice questions: a literature review on the optimal number of options.
    Vyas R; Supe A
    Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 19004145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Does Educator Training or Experience Affect the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions?
    Webb EM; Phuong JS; Naeger DM
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):1317-22. PubMed ID: 26277486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool.
    Kumar D; Jaipurkar R; Shekhar A; Sikri G; Srinivas V
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2021 Feb; 77(Suppl 1):S85-S89. PubMed ID: 33612937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Subjective quality of multiple choice questions used in undergraduate courses in orthopedics and other specialties.
    Husnain A; Khan A; Khan MU; Hussain FN
    Pak J Med Sci; 2020; 36(7):1618-1622. PubMed ID: 33235585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Ware J
    Med Educ; 2008 Feb; 42(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 18230093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of Multiple-Choice Questions by Item Analysis, from an Online Internal Assessment of 6
    Bhattacherjee S; Mukherjee A; Bhandari K; Rout AJ
    Indian J Community Med; 2022; 47(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 35368481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Exploring examinee behaviours as validity evidence for multiple-choice question examinations.
    Surry LT; Torre D; Durning SJ
    Med Educ; 2017 Oct; 51(10):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 28758233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students' perceptions? A mixed methods study.
    Kurtz JB; Lourie MA; Holman EE; Grob KL; Monrad SU
    Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1630239. PubMed ID: 31248355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluating the impact of faculty development programme initiative: Are we really improving skills in MCQ writing?
    Kiran F; Ayub R; Rauf A; Qamar K
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2021 Oct; 71(10):2434-2438. PubMed ID: 34974586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Training Medical Students to Create and Collaboratively Review Multiple-Choice Questions: A Comprehensive Workshop.
    Kurtz J; Holman B; Monrad SU
    MedEdPORTAL; 2020 Oct; 16():10986. PubMed ID: 33083537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Item and Test Analysis to Identify Quality Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) from an Assessment of Medical Students of Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
    Gajjar S; Sharma R; Kumar P; Rana M
    Indian J Community Med; 2014 Jan; 39(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 24696535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluating the quality of multiple-choice question pilot database: A global educator-created tool for concept-based pharmacology learning.
    Netere AK; Hughes T; Babey AM; Hawes M; Mifsud J; Kelly JP; Liang W; Hernandez M; Karpa K; Al-Sallami H; Fernandes LB; Aronsson P; Restini C; Caetano Crowley F; Djouma E; Hinton T; Liu JJ; Mraiche F; White PJ
    Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2024 Oct; 12(5):e70004. PubMed ID: 39268814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Formulation of multiple choice questions as a revision exercise at the end of a teaching module in biochemistry.
    Bobby Z; Radhika MR; Nandeesha H; Balasubramanian A; Prerna S; Archana N; Thippeswamy DN
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2012; 40(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 22615224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluating the quality of multiple-choice questions in a NAPLEX preparation book.
    Danh T; Desiderio T; Herrmann V; Lyons HM; Patrick F; Wantuch GA; Dell KA
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2020 Oct; 12(10):1188-1193. PubMed ID: 32739055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice question tests for quality parameters: A randomized study.
    Vegada B; Shukla A; Khilnani A; Charan J; Desai C
    Indian J Pharmacol; 2016; 48(5):571-575. PubMed ID: 27721545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Assessment of basic medical sciences in an integrated systems-based curriculum.
    Moqattash S; Harris PF; Gumaa KA; Abu-Hijleh MF
    Clin Anat; 1995; 8(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 7712326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Item Analysis of Single Best Response Type Multiple Choice Questions for Formative Assessment in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
    Kulshreshtha S; Gupta G; Goyal G; Gupta K; Davda K
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2024 Jun; 74(3):256-264. PubMed ID: 38974743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Developing a Problem-Based Learning Approach to the Integration of Environmental and Occupational Health Topics into Medical School Curriculum.
    Garg A; Mulloy KB
    J Occup Environ Med; 2018 Aug; 60(8):754-759. PubMed ID: 29557838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.