128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24639851)
21. The role of Acucise endopyelotomy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Biyani CS; Minhas S; el Cast J; Almond DJ; Cooksey G; Hetherington JW
Eur Urol; 2002 Mar; 41(3):305-10; discussion 310-1. PubMed ID: 12180233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Is Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants Under 1 Year of Age a Good Option?
Zamfir Snykers C; De Plaen E; Vermersch S; Lopez M; Khelif K; Luyckx S; Philippe P; Varlet F; Steyaert H
Front Pediatr; 2019; 7():352. PubMed ID: 31608264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children by polar vessels. Is laparoscopic vascular hitching procedure a good solution? Single center experience on 35 consecutive patients.
Chiarenza SF; Bleve C; Fasoli L; Battaglino F; Bucci V; Novek S; Zolpi E
J Pediatr Surg; 2016 Feb; 51(2):310-4. PubMed ID: 26522896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic pyeloplasty: multicentric comparative study of techniques and accesses.
Juliano RV; Mendonça RR; Meyer F; Rubinstein M; Lasmar MT; Korkes F; Tavares A; Pompeo AC; Tobias-Machado M
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011 Jun; 21(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 21561336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparoscopic transposition of lower pole crossing vessels (vascular hitch) in children with pelviureteric junction obstruction.
Esposito C; Bleve C; Escolino M; Caione P; Gerocarni Nappo S; Farina A; Caprio MG; Cerulo M; La Manna A; Chiarenza SF
Transl Pediatr; 2016 Oct; 5(4):256-261. PubMed ID: 27867849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Critical analysis of outcome after open dismembered pyeloplasty in ectopic pelvic kidneys in a pediatric cohort.
Helmy TE; Sarhan OM; Sharaf DE; Shalaby I; Harraz AM; Hafez AT; Dawaba ME
Urology; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1357-60. PubMed ID: 23102440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Minimal invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in low volume pelvis: A comparative study of endopyelotomy and laparoscopic nondismembered pyeloplasty.
Singh P; Jain P; Dharaskar A; Mandhani A; Dubey D; Kapoor R; Kumar A; Srivastava A
Indian J Urol; 2009 Jan; 25(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 19468432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for children with pelvic ureteric junction obstruction: an institutional experience.
Nasir AA; Abraham MK; Sudarshan B; Puzhankara R; Kedari P
Niger Postgrad Med J; 2014 Mar; 21(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 24887251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Feasibility and safety of retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site dismembered pyeloplasty: a clinical report of 10 cases.
Chen Z; Chen X; Wu ZH; Luo YC; He Y; Li NN; Xie CQ; Lai C
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Sep; 22(7):685-90. PubMed ID: 22845552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [ROBOT ASSISTED PYELOPLASTY IN ADULTS WITH URETERO-PELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION (UPJO)].
Yacobi Y; Abu-Ghanem Y; Dotan ZA; Kleinmann N; Mor Y; Zilberman DE
Harefuah; 2021 Sep; 160(9):570-575. PubMed ID: 34482668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Following Open Pyeloplasty in Children.
Powell C; Gatti JM; Juang D; Murphy JP
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Oct; 25(10):858-63. PubMed ID: 26488107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Retroperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty: initial experiences.
Cutting C; Borup K; Barber N; Choi W; Poulsen EU; Poulsen J
Int J Urol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1166-70. PubMed ID: 16984546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Retrospective comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty using barbed suture versus nonbarbed suture: A single-center experience.
Giri V; Yadav SS; Tomar V; Jha AK; Garg A
Urol Ann; 2019; 11(4):410-413. PubMed ID: 31649463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Calvert RC; Morsy MM; Zelhof B; Rhodes M; Burgess NA
Surg Endosc; 2008 Feb; 22(2):411-4. PubMed ID: 17593442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Weise ES; Winfield HN
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic cranial plication in pelviureteral junction obstruction by aberrant lower pole artery.
Masood J; Panah A; Zaman F; Papatsoris AG; Buchholz N; Junaid I
J Endourol; 2009 Jan; 23(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 19178169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Renal ultrasound changes after internal double-J stented pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Egan SC; Stock JA; Hanna MK
Tech Urol; 2001 Dec; 7(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 11763487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Uretero-Pelvic Junction Stenosis: Considerations on the Appropriate Timing of Correction Based on an Infant Population Treated with a Minimally-Invasive Technique.
Lima M; Di Salvo N; Portoraro A; Maffi M; Parente G; Catania VD; Gargano T
Children (Basel); 2021 Feb; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 33557240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Role of laparoscopy in ureteropelvic junction obstruction with concomitant pathology: a case series study.
Fahmy O; El-Fayoumi AR; Gakis G; Amend B; Khairul-Asri MG; Stenzl A; Schwentner C
Cent European J Urol; 2015; 68(4):466-70. PubMed ID: 26855804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Laparoscopic Versus Open Pyeloplasty for Primary Pelvic Ureteric Junction Obstruction: A Prospective Single Centre Study.
Rehman OF; Umair M; Hussain AK; Faraz A; Iqbal M; Waqar M; Tahir M; Khan AR
Cureus; 2020 Oct; 12(10):e11087. PubMed ID: 33235822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
