825 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24642053)
1. Interrater and intrarater agreements of magnetic resonance imaging findings in the lumbar spine: significant variability across degenerative conditions.
Fu MC; Buerba RA; Long WD; Blizzard DJ; Lischuk AW; Haims AH; Grauer JN
Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2442-8. PubMed ID: 24642053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of agreement of cervical spine degenerative pathology findings in magnetic resonance imaging studies.
Fu MC; Webb ML; Buerba RA; Neway WE; Brown JE; Trivedi M; Lischuk AW; Haims AH; Grauer JN
Spine J; 2016 Jan; 16(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 26291398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Commentary: Interrater and intrarater agreements of magnetic resonance imaging findings in the lumbar spine.
Boden SD
Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2449-50. PubMed ID: 25256898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-Dimensional Isotropic MRI of the Cervical Spine: A Diagnostic Comparison With Conventional MRI.
Fu MC; Buerba RA; Neway WE; Brown JE; Trivedi M; Lischuk AW; Haims AH; Grauer JN
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Mar; 29(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 26889989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
Singh K; Samartzis D; Vaccaro AR; Nassr A; Andersson GB; Yoon ST; Phillips FM; Goldberg EJ; An HS
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interrater and intrarater reliability of lumbar spine magnetic resonance assessment of military aircraft pilot candidates.
Truszczyńska A; Brychcy A; Rąpała K; Walczak P; Truszczyński O; Tarnowski A
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2011; 13(4):343-51. PubMed ID: 21857065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Pfirrmann classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: an independent inter- and intra-observer agreement assessment.
Urrutia J; Besa P; Campos M; Cikutovic P; Cabezon M; Molina M; Cruz JP
Eur Spine J; 2016 Sep; 25(9):2728-33. PubMed ID: 26879918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D-FSE Isotropic MRI of the Lumbar Spine: Novel Application of an Existing Technology.
Blizzard DJ; Haims AH; Lischuk AW; Arunakul R; Hustedt JW; Grauer JN
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 May; 28(4):152-7. PubMed ID: 23168390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T.
Lee S; Jee WH; Jung JY; Lee SY; Ryu KS; Ha KY
Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24553584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lurie JD; Tosteson AN; Tosteson TD; Carragee E; Carrino JA; Kaiser J; Sequeiros RT; Lecomte AR; Grove MR; Blood EA; Pearson LH; Weinstein JN; Herzog R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(14):1605-10. PubMed ID: 18552677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External validation of the deep learning system "SpineNet" for grading radiological features of degeneration on MRIs of the lumbar spine.
Grob A; Loibl M; Jamaludin A; Winklhofer S; Fairbank JCT; Fekete T; Porchet F; Mannion AF
Eur Spine J; 2022 Aug; 31(8):2137-2148. PubMed ID: 35835892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Modified MRI short time inversion recovery sequence grading system for lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration].
Pan W; Wang J; Liu J; Lu Y; Huang B
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 26(12):1430-4. PubMed ID: 23316630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The reliability of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging grading of lumbar facet arthropathy in total disc replacement patients.
Stieber J; Quirno M; Cunningham M; Errico TJ; Bendo JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):E833-40. PubMed ID: 19927089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Redefining lumbar spinal stenosis as a developmental syndrome: does age matter?
Kitab S; Habboub G; Abdulkareem SB; Alimidhatti MB; Benzel E
J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 May; 31(3):357-365. PubMed ID: 31100722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Verification of measurements of lumbar spinal dimensions in T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences.
Cheung JP; Shigematsu H; Cheung KM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1476-83. PubMed ID: 24314906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and degenerative lumbar intervertebral discs: a new method to potentially quantify the physiologic effect of physical therapy intervention.
Beattie PF; Morgan PS; Peters D
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2008 Feb; 38(2):42-9. PubMed ID: 18560192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative measures of modic changes in lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging: intra- and inter-rater reliability.
Wang Y; Videman T; Niemeläinen R; Battié MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):1236-43. PubMed ID: 21217445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic capability of low- versus high-field magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar degenerative disease.
Lee RK; Griffith JF; Lau YY; Leung JH; Ng AW; Hung EH; Law SW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Mar; 40(6):382-91. PubMed ID: 25584942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simplified Universal Grading of Lumbar Spine MRI Degenerative Findings: Inter-Reader Agreement of Non-Radiologist Spine Experts.
Miskin N; Isaac Z; Lu Y; Makhni MC; Sarno DL; Smith TR; Zampini JM; Mandell JC
Pain Med; 2021 Jul; 22(7):1485-1495. PubMed ID: 33713135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Observer variability based on the strength of MR scanners in the assessment of lumbar degenerative disc disease.
Cihangiroglu M; Yildirim H; Bozgeyik Z; Senol U; Ozdemir H; Topsakal C; Yilmaz S
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 15294326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
