225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24642250)
21. The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer.
Park W; Park YJ; Huh SJ; Kim BG; Bae DS; Lee J; Kim BH; Choi JY; Ahn YC; Lim DH
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 35(5):260-4. PubMed ID: 15886267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Nodal staging of rectal cancer: high-resolution pelvic MRI versus ¹⁸F-FDGPET/CT.
Kim DJ; Kim JH; Ryu YH; Jeon TJ; Yu JS; Chung JJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):531-4. PubMed ID: 21926843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Value of PET-CT in avoiding multimodality therapy in operable cervical cancer.
Goyal BK; Singh H; Kapur K; Duggal BS; Jacob MJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Aug; 20(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 20683414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of multifocality and axillary nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer patients using 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node biopsy.
Ergul N; Kadioglu H; Yildiz S; Yucel SB; Gucin Z; Erdogan EB; Aydin M; Muslumanoglu M
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):917-23. PubMed ID: 25013091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI vs. PET/CT for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent malignancies of the female pelvis: initial results.
Beiderwellen K; Grueneisen J; Ruhlmann V; Buderath P; Aktas B; Heusch P; Kraff O; Forsting M; Lauenstein TC; Umutlu L
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Jan; 42(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 25223420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer.
Kim HJ; Cho A; Yun M; Kim YT; Kang WJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 26546334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preoperative staging of cervical cancer: is 18-FDG-PET/CT really effective in patients with early stage disease?
Signorelli M; Guerra L; Montanelli L; Crivellaro C; Buda A; Dell'Anna T; Picchio M; Milani R; Fruscio R; Messa C
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Nov; 123(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 21855972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Tumor Staging in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer: A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Grueneisen J; Nagarajah J; Buchbender C; Hoffmann O; Schaarschmidt BM; Poeppel T; Forsting M; Quick HH; Umutlu L; Kinner S
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):505-13. PubMed ID: 26115367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical impact of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the pretreatment evaluation of patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
Akkas BE; Demirel BB; Vural GU
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Oct; 33(10):1081-8. PubMed ID: 22926065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Histologic results of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients treated for stage IB2/II cervical cancer with negative [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans in the para-aortic area.
Boughanim M; Leboulleux S; Rey A; Pham CT; Zafrani Y; Duvillard P; Lumbroso J; Haie-Meder C; Schlumberger M; Morice P
J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(15):2558-61. PubMed ID: 18487573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of
Sarabhai T; Schaarschmidt BM; Wetter A; Kirchner J; Aktas B; Forsting M; Ruhlmann V; Herrmann K; Umutlu L; Grueneisen J
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jan; 45(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 28840302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic performance of conventional and advanced imaging modalities for assessing newly diagnosed cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Woo S; Atun R; Ward ZJ; Scott AM; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5560-5577. PubMed ID: 32415584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.
Kauhanen SP; Komar G; Seppänen MP; Dean KI; Minn HR; Kajander SA; Rinta-Kiikka I; Alanen K; Borra RJ; Puolakkainen PA; Nuutila P; Ovaska JT
Ann Surg; 2009 Dec; 250(6):957-63. PubMed ID: 19687736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Detection of occult primary tumors in patients with cervical metastases of unknown primary tumors: comparison of (18)F FDG PET/CT with contrast-enhanced CT or CT/MR imaging-prospective study.
Lee JR; Kim JS; Roh JL; Lee JH; Baek JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 25405771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Detection of hematogenous bone metastasis in cervical cancer: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography versus computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Liu FY; Yen TC; Chen MY; Lai CH; Chang TC; Chou HH; Hong JH; Chen YR; Ng KK
Cancer; 2009 Dec; 115(23):5470-80. PubMed ID: 19739235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prospective study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with palpably negative neck.
Ng SH; Yen TC; Chang JT; Chan SC; Ko SF; Wang HM; Lee LY; Kang CJ; Wong AM; Liao CT
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Sep; 24(27):4371-6. PubMed ID: 16983105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [STAGING CERVICAL CANCER USING PET-CT AND PET-MRI].
Cohen D; Hazut Krauthammer S; Levine C; Even-Sapir E
Harefuah; 2021 Jul; 160(7):442-447. PubMed ID: 34263572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic performance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging fusion images of gynecological malignant tumors: comparison with positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Nakajo K; Tatsumi M; Inoue A; Isohashi K; Higuchi I; Kato H; Imaizumi M; Enomoto T; Shimosegawa E; Kimura T; Hatazawa J
Jpn J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 28(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 20182843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in early-stage cervical carcinoma.
Yu L; Jia C; Wang X; Lu P; Tian M; Wang W; Lou G
Am J Med Sci; 2011 Feb; 341(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 21030858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation.
Ng SH; Yen TC; Liao CT; Chang JT; Chan SC; Ko SF; Wang HM; Wong HF
J Nucl Med; 2005 Jul; 46(7):1136-43. PubMed ID: 16000282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
