These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24642776)

  • 41. Making sense of a haemolysis monitoring and reporting system: a nationwide longitudinal multimethod study of 68 Australian laboratory participant organisations.
    Li L; Vecellio E; Gay S; Lake R; Mackay M; Burnett L; Chesher D; Braye S; Badrick T; Westbrook JI; Georgiou A
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2018 Mar; 56(4):565-573. PubMed ID: 28915106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The impact of specimen management in microbiology.
    Miller JM
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 May; 30(5):28-30, 32, 34; quiz 35-6. PubMed ID: 10179685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Key factors influencing the incidence of hemolysis: A critical appraisal of current evidence.
    McCaughey EJ; Vecellio E; Lake R; Li L; Burnett L; Chesher D; Braye S; Mackay M; Gay S; Badrick T; Westbrook J; Georgiou A
    Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 2017 Jan; 54(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 28013559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Influence of an observer in the haemolysis produced during the extraction of blood samples in primary care].
    Bel-Peña N; Mérida-de la Torre FJ
    Rev Calid Asist; 2015; 30(6):297-301. PubMed ID: 26546170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reduction in Hospital-Wide Clinical Laboratory Specimen Identification Errors following Process Interventions: A 10-Year Retrospective Observational Study.
    Ning HC; Lin CN; Chiu DT; Chang YT; Wen CN; Peng SY; Chu TL; Yu HM; Wu TL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160821. PubMed ID: 27494020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine?
    Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 16729864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Surgical specimen identification errors: a new measure of quality in surgical care.
    Makary MA; Epstein J; Pronovost PJ; Millman EA; Hartmann EC; Freischlag JA
    Surgery; 2007 Apr; 141(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 17383521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. EDTA contamination in laboratory specimens-effect of an awareness campaign.
    Ijaz A; Maqsood-ul-Hassan ; Khan IM; Saeed F; Tariq KM
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jun; 20(6):405-7. PubMed ID: 20642972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Spanish Preanalytical Quality Monitoring Program (SEQC), an overview of 12 years' experience.
    Llopis MA; Bauça JM; Barba N; Álvarez V; Ventura M; Ibarz M; Gómez-Rioja R; Marzana I; Puente JJ; Segovia M; Martinez D; Alsina MJ
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 55(4):530-538. PubMed ID: 27658151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Prevalence of Pre-Analytical Errors in Clinical Chemistry Diagnostic Labs in Sulaimani City of Iraqi Kurdistan.
    Najat D
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170211. PubMed ID: 28107395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. National survey on the pre-analytical variability in a representative cohort of Italian laboratories.
    Lippi G; Montagnana M; Giavarina D; ; ;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(12):1491-4. PubMed ID: 17163828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Specimen labeling errors in surgical pathology: an 18-month experience.
    Layfield LJ; Anderson GM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Sep; 134(3):466-70. PubMed ID: 20716804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Monitoring and reporting of preanalytical errors in laboratory medicine: the UK situation.
    Cornes MP; Atherton J; Pourmahram G; Borthwick H; Kyle B; West J; Costelloe SJ
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2016 Mar; 53(Pt 2):279-84. PubMed ID: 26195485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine.
    Plebani M
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2010 Mar; 47(Pt 2):101-10. PubMed ID: 19952034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Four indefensible phlebotomy errors and how to prevent them.
    Ernst DJ
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 1998; 18(2):41-6. PubMed ID: 10185077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Preanalytical quality control program - an overview of results (2001-2005 summary).
    Alsina MJ; Alvarez V; Barba N; Bullich S; Cortés M; Escoda I; Martínez-Brú C
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(6):849-54. PubMed ID: 18601609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A study of pre-analytical variables in clinical biochemistry laboratory.
    Ashakiran S; Sumati ME; Murthy NK
    Clin Biochem; 2011 Jul; 44(10-11):944-5. PubMed ID: 21601567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A quality initiative to decrease pathology specimen-labeling errors using radiofrequency identification in a high-volume endoscopy center.
    Francis DL; Prabhakar S; Sanderson SO
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 104(4):972-5. PubMed ID: 19259073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Analysis of ABO discrepancies occurring in 35 French hospitals.
    Chiaroni J; Legrand D; Dettori I; Ferrera V
    Transfusion; 2004 Jun; 44(6):860-4. PubMed ID: 15157252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Voluntary electronic reporting of laboratory errors: an analysis of 37,532 laboratory event reports from 30 health care organizations.
    Snydman LK; Harubin B; Kumar S; Chen J; Lopez RE; Salem DN
    Am J Med Qual; 2012; 27(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 21918013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.