These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24642832)

  • 1. Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening.
    van Schendel RV; Kleinveld JH; Dondorp WJ; Pajkrt E; Timmermans DR; Holtkamp KC; Karsten M; Vlietstra AL; Lachmeijer AM; Henneman L
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2014 Dec; 22(12):1345-50. PubMed ID: 24642832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What Do Parents of Children with Down Syndrome Think about Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)?
    van Schendel RV; Kater-Kuipers A; van Vliet-Lachotzki EH; Dondorp WJ; Cornel MC; Henneman L
    J Genet Couns; 2017 Jun; 26(3):522-531. PubMed ID: 27618823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.
    Kater-Kuipers A; Bunnik EM; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RJH
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Oct; 18(1):409. PubMed ID: 30340550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Obstetric professionals' perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: clinical usefulness compared with existing tests and ethical implications.
    Ngan OMY; Yi H; Wong SYS; Sahota D; Ahmed S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Sep; 17(1):285. PubMed ID: 28870159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think?
    van Schendel RV; Dondorp WJ; Timmermans DR; van Hugte EJ; de Boer A; Pajkrt E; Lachmeijer AM; Henneman L
    Prenat Diagn; 2015 Jun; 35(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 25693726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: what women want and are willing to pay.
    Verweij EJ; Oepkes D; de Vries M; van den Akker ME; van den Akker ES; de Boer MA
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):641-5. PubMed ID: 24011429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21: a cross-sectional survey of service users' views and likely uptake.
    Lewis C; Hill M; Silcock C; Daley R; Chitty LS
    BJOG; 2014 Apr; 121(5):582-94. PubMed ID: 24433394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motivations for undertaking DNA sequencing-based non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy: a qualitative study with early adopter patients in Hong Kong.
    Yi H; Hallowell N; Griffiths S; Yeung Leung T
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e81794. PubMed ID: 24312358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of experiential knowledge and societal perceptions on decision-making regarding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
    Montgomery S; Thayer ZM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):630. PubMed ID: 33076858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementing non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Netherlands: An interview study exploring opinions about and experiences with societal pressure, reimbursement, and an expanding scope.
    Bakkeren IM; Kater-Kuipers A; Bunnik EM; Go ATJI; Tibben A; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RH; Riedijk SR
    J Genet Couns; 2020 Feb; 29(1):112-121. PubMed ID: 31710169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part II-women's perspectives.
    van Schendel RV; Page-Christiaens GC; Beulen L; Bilardo CM; de Boer MA; Coumans AB; Faas BH; van Langen IM; Lichtenbelt KD; van Maarle MC; Macville MV; Oepkes D; Pajkrt E; Henneman L;
    Prenat Diagn; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1091-1098. PubMed ID: 27739584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reasons for accepting or declining Down syndrome screening in Dutch prospective mothers within the context of national policy and healthcare system characteristics: a qualitative study.
    Crombag NM; Boeije H; Iedema-Kuiper R; Schielen PC; Visser GH; Bensing JM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 May; 16(1):121. PubMed ID: 27229318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing in Dutch national health care: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Beulen L; Grutters JP; Faas BH; Feenstra I; van Vugt JM; Bekker MN
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():53-61. PubMed ID: 25238658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Financial contribution as reason to opt out of non-invasive prenatal testing.
    Bet BB; Wielart L; Ravelli ACJ; van Wely M; van Leeuwen E; Pajkrt E
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Aug; 287():130-136. PubMed ID: 37311275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of non-invasive prenatal testing: preferences of Canadian pregnant women, their partners, and health professionals regarding NIPT use and access.
    Birko S; Ravitsky V; Dupras C; Le Clerc-Blain J; Lemoine ME; Affdal AO; Haidar H; Laberge AM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jan; 19(1):22. PubMed ID: 30630440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome: pregnant women's views and likely uptake.
    Lewis C; Silcock C; Chitty LS
    Public Health Genomics; 2013; 16(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 23886854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Women's preference for non-invasive prenatal DNA testing versus chromosomal microarray after screening for Down syndrome: a prospective study.
    Cheng Y; Leung WC; Leung TY; Choy KW; Chiu R; Lo TK; Kwok KY; Sahota DS
    BJOG; 2018 Mar; 125(4):451-459. PubMed ID: 29125674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy.
    Lewis C; Hill M; Skirton H; Chitty LS
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jun; 24(6):809-16. PubMed ID: 26508572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study.
    Oxenford K; Daley R; Lewis C; Hill M; Chitty LS
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Apr; 17(1):132. PubMed ID: 28449648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Women's Experiences and Preferences for Service Delivery of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Aneuploidy in a Public Health Setting: A Mixed Methods Study.
    Lewis C; Hill M; Chitty LS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153147. PubMed ID: 27045195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.