These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24642984)

  • 1. Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal estradiol in overcoming unsatisfactory colposcopy.
    Makkar B; Batra S; Gandhi G; Zutshi V; Goswami D
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2014; 77(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 24642984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of misoprostol in overcoming an unsatisfactory colposcopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.
    Aggarwal R; Suneja A; Agarwal N; Mishra K
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2006; 62(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 16735793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can vaginal misoprostol effectively increase rate of a satisfactory colposcopy? A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
    Thanapprapasr D; Wilailak S; Ayudhya NI; Lertkhachonsuk AA; Likittanasombut P; Chittithaworn S; Charakorn C; Weerakiet S
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2010 Mar; 40(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 19875508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial.
    Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Krikstolaitis R; Gintautas V; Nadisauskiene R
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1431-7. PubMed ID: 17083652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective double blind study using oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction.
    Mehrotra S; Singh U; Gupta HP
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):461-4. PubMed ID: 20604647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy in premenopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of vaginal and oral misoprostol.
    Batukan C; Ozgun MT; Ozcelik B; Aygen E; Sahin Y; Turkyilmaz C
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):966-73. PubMed ID: 17681307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study.
    Caliskan E; Bodur H; Ozeren S; Corakci A; Ozkan S; Yucesoy I
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15640607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before hysteroscopy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Tanha FD; Salimi S; Ghajarzadeh M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 May; 287(5):937-40. PubMed ID: 23208460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A combination of misoprostol and estradiol for preoperative cervical ripening in postmenopausal women: a randomised controlled trial.
    Oppegaard KS; Lieng M; Berg A; Istre O; Qvigstad E; Nesheim BI
    BJOG; 2010 Jan; 117(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 20002369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
    Paisarntantiwong R; Getgan M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S56-62. PubMed ID: 17722318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized comparison of one single dose of vaginal 50 microg misoprostol with 3 mg dinoprostone in pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Charoenkul S; Sripramote M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Sep; 83(9):1026-34. PubMed ID: 11075969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Rouzi AA; Alsibiani S; Mansouri N; Alsinani N; Darhouse K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23999422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert in parous women for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ewert K; Powers B; Robertson S; Alfirevic Z
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17077234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
    Culver J; Strauss RA; Brody S; Dorman K; Timlin S; McMahon MJ
    Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized prospective placebo-controlled study.
    Zahran KM; Shahin AY; Abdellah MS; Elsayh KI
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1054-60. PubMed ID: 20144171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial.
    Bricker L; Peden H; Tomlinson AJ; Al-Hussaini TK; Idama T; Candelier C; Luckas M; Furniss H; Davies A; Kumar B; Roberts J; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18752586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.