These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24643790)

  • 41. Embodiment meets metamemory: weight as a cue for metacognitive judgments.
    Alban MW; Kelley CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1628-34. PubMed ID: 23565793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Judgments of learning index relative confidence, not subjective probability.
    Zawadzka K; Higham PA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1168-79. PubMed ID: 26111879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Age differences in the monitoring of learning: cross-sectional evidence of spared resolution across the adult life span.
    Hertzog C; Sinclair SM; Dunlosky J
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jul; 46(4):939-48. PubMed ID: 20604613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Do older adults show less confidence in their monitoring of learning?
    Serra MJ; Dunlosky J; Hertzog C
    Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 18726751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Enhanced metamemory at delays: why do judgments of learning improve over time?
    Kelemen WL; Weaver CA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Nov; 23(6):1394-409. PubMed ID: 9372607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Using the past to predict the future.
    Dougherty MR; Scheck P; Nelson TO; Narens L
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1096-115. PubMed ID: 16496729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Learning style, judgements of learning, and learning of verbal and visual information.
    Knoll AR; Otani H; Skeel RL; Van Horn KR
    Br J Psychol; 2017 Aug; 108(3):544-563. PubMed ID: 27620075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: the utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning.
    Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):429-37. PubMed ID: 18426071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs.
    Dunlosky J; Matvey G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1180-91. PubMed ID: 11550746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Multiple bases for young and older adults' judgments of learning in multitrial learning.
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):474-83. PubMed ID: 21942899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Does delaying judgments of learning really improve the efficacy of study decisions? Not so much.
    Kimball DR; Smith TA; Muntean WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):923-54. PubMed ID: 22250913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Delayed judgments of learning cause both a decrease in absolute accuracy (calibration) and an increase in relative accuracy (resolution).
    Van Overschelde JP; Nelson TO
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Oct; 34(7):1527-38. PubMed ID: 17263076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
    Illman NA; Morrison CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Judgments of learning: evidence for a two-stage process.
    Son LK; Metcalfe J
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1116-29. PubMed ID: 16496730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Younger and older adults weigh multiple cues in a similar manner to generate judgments of learning.
    Hines JC; Hertzog C; Touron DR
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2015; 22(6):693-711. PubMed ID: 25827630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Metacognitive judgments-of-learning in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.
    Wojcik DZ; Waterman AH; Lestié C; Moulin CJ; Souchay C
    Autism; 2014 May; 18(4):393-408. PubMed ID: 24151127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The contributions of anchoring and past-test performance to the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
    England BD; Serra MJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):715-22. PubMed ID: 22477335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: effects on monitoring and control.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Jun; 16(3):550-4. PubMed ID: 19451383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The sensitivity of judgment-of-learning resolution to past test performance, new learning, and forgetting.
    Ariel R; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):171-84. PubMed ID: 21264621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Judgments of learning as memory modifiers.
    Soderstrom NC; Clark CT; Halamish V; Bjork EL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):553-8. PubMed ID: 25528101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.