These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24644229)

  • 1. The use of dental putty in the assessment of hard surfaces within paved urban areas that may leave defined or patterned marks on bodies.
    Johnson OR; Lyall M; Johnson CP
    Med Sci Law; 2015 Apr; 55(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 24644229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chemical enhancement of footwear impressions in blood deposited on fabric--evaluating the use of alginate casting materials followed by chemical enhancement.
    Farrugia KJ; NicDaéid N; Savage KA; Bandey H
    Sci Justice; 2010 Dec; 50(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 21075299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the quality of footwear marks recovered from simulated graves.
    Stephens M; Errickson D; Giles SB; Ringrose TJ
    Sci Justice; 2020 Nov; 60(6):512-521. PubMed ID: 33077034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between visible wavelength hyperspectral imaging and digital photography for the detection and identification of bloodstained footwear marks.
    Crowther M; Li B; Thompson T; Islam M
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2424-2437. PubMed ID: 34363402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential analysis of very small particles (VSP) from the contact surfaces and recessed areas of footwear.
    Stoney DA; Bowen AM; Ausdemore M; Stoney PL; Neumann C; Stoney FP
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 May; 298():106-114. PubMed ID: 30901709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying randomly acquired characteristics on outsoles in terms of shape and position.
    Speir JA; Richetelli N; Fagert M; Hite M; Bodziak WJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():399-411. PubMed ID: 27416269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of bite marks and teeth features using 2D and 3D methods].
    Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D; Glapiński M; Zaba C; Łabecka M
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2011; 61(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 22390125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digitally processing an image of a shoe impression in blood.
    Daniel O; Levi A; Chaikovsky A; Cohen Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):1143-1147. PubMed ID: 33332705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulating forensic casework scenarios in experimental studies: The generation of footwear marks in blood.
    McElhone RL; Meakin GE; French JC; Alexander T; Morgan RM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():34-40. PubMed ID: 27017082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lifting bloody footwear impressions using alginate casts followed by chemical enhancement.
    Wiesner S; Izraeli E; Shor Y; Domb A
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 May; 58(3):782-8. PubMed ID: 23488772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of five brands of latex gloves on the setting time of polyvinyl siloxane putty impression materials.
    Ravikumar CM; Sangur R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 22945711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An experimental model of tool mark striations by a serrated blade in human soft tissues.
    Jacques R; Kogon S; Shkrum M
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2014 Mar; 35(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 24457587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical note: The Next Step - a semi-automatic coding and comparison system for forensic footwear impressions.
    Daniel O; Levi A; Pertsev R; Issan Y; Pasternak Z; Cohen A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Aug; 337():111378. PubMed ID: 35839684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A metric study of insole foot impressions in footwear of identical twins.
    Nirenberg MS; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Nov; 52():116-121. PubMed ID: 28918370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Casting of 3-dimensional footwear prints in snow with foam blocks.
    Petraco N; Sherman H; Dumitra A; Roberts M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():147-151. PubMed ID: 27124876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controlling the variable of pressure in the production of test footwear impressions.
    Farrugia KJ; Riches P; Bandey H; Savage K; NicDaéid N
    Sci Justice; 2012 Sep; 52(3):168-76. PubMed ID: 22841140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical discrimination of footwear: a method for the comparison of accidentals on shoe outsoles inspired by facial recognition techniques.
    Petraco ND; Gambino C; Kubic TA; Olivio D; Petraco N
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 19895540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials.
    Haim M; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H; Koch R; Walter MH; Quaas S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 19548415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of a range of addition silicone putty-wash impression materials used in the one-stage technique.
    Abuasi HA; Wassell RW
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Mar; 2(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 7920403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.