These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24644267)

  • 1. Are power calculations useful? A multicentre neuroimaging study.
    Suckling J; Henty J; Ecker C; Deoni SC; Lombardo MV; Baron-Cohen S; Jezzard P; Barnes A; Chakrabarti B; Ooi C; Lai MC; Williams SC; Murphy DG; Bullmore E;
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Aug; 35(8):3569-77. PubMed ID: 24644267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the brain structure heterogeneity of autism: Parsing out acquisition site effects with significance-weighted principal component analysis.
    Martinez-Murcia FJ; Lai MC; Górriz JM; Ramírez J; Young AM; Deoni SC; Ecker C; Lombardo MV; ; Baron-Cohen S; Murphy DG; Bullmore ET; Suckling J
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Mar; 38(3):1208-1223. PubMed ID: 27774713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standardized Brain MRI Acquisition Protocols Improve Statistical Power in Multicenter Quantitative Morphometry Studies.
    George A; Kuzniecky R; Rusinek H; Pardoe HR;
    J Neuroimaging; 2020 Jan; 30(1):126-133. PubMed ID: 31664774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical power and prediction accuracy in multisite resting-state fMRI connectivity.
    Dansereau C; Benhajali Y; Risterucci C; Pich EM; Orban P; Arnold D; Bellec P
    Neuroimage; 2017 Apr; 149():220-232. PubMed ID: 28161310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power calculations for multicenter imaging studies controlled by the false discovery rate.
    Suckling J; Barnes A; Job D; Brenan D; Lymer K; Dazzan P; Marques TR; MacKay C; McKie S; Williams SR; Williams SC; Lawrie S; Deakin B
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Aug; 31(8):1183-95. PubMed ID: 20063303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of sample size on the reproducibility of voxel-based lesion-deficit mappings.
    Lorca-Puls DL; Gajardo-Vidal A; White J; Seghier ML; Leff AP; Green DW; Crinion JT; Ludersdorfer P; Hope TMH; Bowman H; Price CJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jul; 115():101-111. PubMed ID: 29550526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MIDAS: Regionally linear multivariate discriminative statistical mapping.
    Varol E; Sotiras A; Davatzikos C
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 174():111-126. PubMed ID: 29524624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size estimates for well-powered cross-sectional cortical thickness studies.
    Pardoe HR; Abbott DF; Jackson GD;
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Nov; 34(11):3000-9. PubMed ID: 22807270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping reliability in multicenter MRI: voxel-based morphometry and cortical thickness.
    Schnack HG; van Haren NE; Brouwer RM; van Baal GC; Picchioni M; Weisbrod M; Sauer H; Cannon TD; Huttunen M; Lepage C; Collins DL; Evans A; Murray RM; Kahn RS; Hulshoff Pol HE
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Dec; 31(12):1967-82. PubMed ID: 21086550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a continuous outcome.
    Archer L; Snell KIE; Ensor J; Hudda MT; Collins GS; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(1):133-146. PubMed ID: 33150684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intracortical smoothing of small-voxel fMRI data can provide increased detection power without spatial resolution losses compared to conventional large-voxel fMRI data.
    Blazejewska AI; Fischl B; Wald LL; Polimeni JR
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():601-614. PubMed ID: 30690157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The bootstrap and cross-validation in neuroimaging applications: estimation of the distribution of extrema of random fields for single volume tests, with an application to ADC maps.
    Viviani R; Beschoner P; Jaeckle T; Hipp P; Kassubek J; Schmitz B
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Oct; 28(10):1075-88. PubMed ID: 17266105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced signal detection in neuroimaging by means of regional control of the global false discovery rate.
    Langers DR; Jansen JF; Backes WH
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 38(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 17825583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-validation failure: Small sample sizes lead to large error bars.
    Varoquaux G
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt A):68-77. PubMed ID: 28655633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample sizes and population differences in brain template construction.
    Yang G; Zhou S; Bozek J; Dong HM; Han M; Zuo XN; Liu H; Gao JH
    Neuroimage; 2020 Feb; 206():116318. PubMed ID: 31689538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power and sample size calculation for neuroimaging studies by non-central random field theory.
    Hayasaka S; Peiffer AM; Hugenschmidt CE; Laurienti PJ
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):721-30. PubMed ID: 17658273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing within-subject classification and regularization methods in fMRI for large and small sample sizes.
    Churchill NW; Yourganov G; Strother SC
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Sep; 35(9):4499-517. PubMed ID: 24639383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.