188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24645536)
1. Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm.
Adriaenssens N; Buyl R; Lievens P; Fontaine C; Lamote J
Lymphology; 2013 Sep; 46(3):132-43. PubMed ID: 24645536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: A new gold standard for arm volume measurements.
Damstra RJ; Glazenburg EJ; Hop WC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 16752072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel, validated method to quantify breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) following bilateral breast surgery.
Miller CL; Specht MC; Horick N; Skolny MN; Jammallo LS; O'Toole J; Taghian AG
Lymphology; 2013 Jun; 46(2):64-74. PubMed ID: 24354105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.
Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J
Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.
Ridner SH; Montgomery LD; Hepworth JT; Stewart BR; Armer JM
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17539463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.
Czerniec SA; Ward LC; Refshauge KM; Beith J; Lee MJ; York S; Kilbreath SL
Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19916749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of an optoelectronic limb volumeter (Perometer).
Stanton AW; Northfield JW; Holroyd B; Mortimer PS; Levick JR
Lymphology; 1997 Jun; 30(2):77-97. PubMed ID: 9215977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of volume measurement of breast cancer-related lymphedema by three methods: circumference measurement, water displacement, and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Gjorup C; Zerahn B; Hendel HW
Lymphat Res Biol; 2010 Jun; 8(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 20583873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.
Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU
Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional lymphatic collectors in breast cancer-related lymphedema arm.
Liu NF; Wang BS
Lymphat Res Biol; 2014 Dec; 12(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 25495381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Infrared optoelectronic volumetry, the ideal way to measure limb volume.
Tierney S; Aslam M; Rennie K; Grace P
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1996 Nov; 12(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 8980428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical Properties of the Skin in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Compared to Healthy Individuals.
Killaars RC; Penha TR; Heuts EM; van der Hulst RR; Piatkowski AA
Lymphat Res Biol; 2015 Sep; 13(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 26305284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume.
Sander AP; Hajer NM; Hemenway K; Miller AC
Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1201-12. PubMed ID: 12444879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Local tissue water in at-risk and contralateral forearms of women with and without breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema.
Mayrovitz HN; Weingrad DN; Davey S
Lymphat Res Biol; 2009; 7(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 19778203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Compression therapy in breast cancer-related lymphedema: A randomized, controlled comparative study of relation between volume and interface pressure changes.
Damstra RJ; Partsch H
J Vasc Surg; 2009 May; 49(5):1256-63. PubMed ID: 19394553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Arm lymphoedema in a cohort of breast cancer survivors 10 years after diagnosis.
Johansson K; Branje E
Acta Oncol; 2010; 49(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 20100154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Defining lower limb lymphedema after inguinal or ilio-inguinal dissection in patients with melanoma using classification and regression tree analysis.
Spillane AJ; Saw RP; Tucker M; Byth K; Thompson JF
Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 18650640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and concurrent validity of the perometer for measuring hand volume in women with and without lymphedema.
Lee MJ; Boland RA; Czerniec S; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2011 Mar; 9(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 21417763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of breast cancer-related lymphedema on the ability to perform upper extremity activities of daily living.
O'Toole JA; Ferguson CM; Swaroop MN; Horick N; Skolny MN; Brunelle CL; Miller CL; Jammallo LS; Specht MC; Taghian AG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Apr; 150(2):381-8. PubMed ID: 25749734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
