252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24645566)
1. [Comparison of cepstral coefficients to other voice evaluation parameters in patients with occupational dysphonia].
Niebudek-Bogusz E; Strumiłło P; Wiktorowicz J; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
Med Pr; 2013; 64(6):805-16. PubMed ID: 24645566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of Cepstral Acoustic Analysis for Normal and Pathological Voice in the Japanese Language.
Mizuta M; Abe C; Taguchi E; Takeue T; Tamaki H; Haji T
J Voice; 2022 Nov; 36(6):770-776. PubMed ID: 32951954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of voice acoustic parameters related to the vocal-loading test in professionally active teachers with dysphonia.
Niebudek-Bogusz E; Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2007; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17708015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deep learning in automatic detection of dysphonia: Comparing acoustic features and developing a generalizable framework.
Chen Z; Zhu P; Qiu W; Guo J; Li Y
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Mar; 58(2):279-294. PubMed ID: 36117378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laryngeal manual therapy palpatory evaluation scale: A preliminary study to examine its usefulness in diagnosis of occupational dysphonia.
Woźnicka E; Niebudek-Bogusz E; Morawska J; Wiktorowicz J; Śliwińska-Kowalska M
Med Pr; 2017 Mar; 68(2):179-188. PubMed ID: 28345678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of cepstral analysis for differentiating dysphonic from normal voices in children.
Esen Aydinli F; Özcebe E; İncebay Ö
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 116():107-113. PubMed ID: 30554679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between acoustic parameters and Voice Handicap Index in dysphonic teachers.
Niebudek-Bogusz E; Woznicka E; Zamyslowska-Szmytke E; Sliwinska-Kowalska M
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2010; 62(1-2):55-60. PubMed ID: 20093845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of dysphonia: cepstral analysis versus conventional acoustic analysis.
Hassan EM; Abdel Hady AF; Shohdi SS; Eldessouky HM; Din MHB
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2021 Oct; 46(3):99-109. PubMed ID: 32436465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation Between Subjective and Objective Parameters of Voice in Elderly Male Speakers.
Soumya M; Narasimhan SV
J Voice; 2022 Nov; 36(6):823-831. PubMed ID: 33092948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examining Relationships Between GRBAS Ratings and Acoustic, Aerodynamic and Patient-Reported Voice Measures in Adults With Voice Disorders.
Fujiki RB; Thibeault SL
J Voice; 2023 May; 37(3):390-397. PubMed ID: 33750626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cepstral analysis of normal and pathological voice in Spanish adults. Smoothed cepstral peak prominence in sustained vowels versus connected speech.
Delgado-Hernández J; León-Gómez NM; Izquierdo-Arteaga LM; Llanos-Fumero Y
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2018; 69(3):134-140. PubMed ID: 28867553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic and capacity analysis of voice academic teachers with diagnosed hyperfunctional dysphonia by using DiagnoScope Specialist software.
Zielińska-Bliźniewska H; Pietkiewicz P; Miłoński J; Urbaniak J; Olszewski J
Otolaryngol Pol; 2013; 67(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 23719271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do Standard Instrumental Acoustic, Perceptual, and Subjective Voice Outcomes Indicate Therapy Success in Patients With Functional Dysphonia?
Reetz S; Bohlender JE; Brockmann-Bauser M
J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):317-324. PubMed ID: 29395329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repetitive Voice Evaluation in Dysphonic Teachers: Office Versus Home.
Jaber B; Remman R; Matar N
J Voice; 2020 Sep; 34(5):675-681. PubMed ID: 30765321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic analysis with vocal loading test in occupational voice disorders: outcomes before and after voice therapy.
Niebudek-Bogusz E; Kotyło P; Politański P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2008; 21(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 19228577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Nonlinear acoustic analysis in the evaluation of occupational voice disorders].
Niebudek-Bogusz E; Grygiel J; Strumiłło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
Med Pr; 2013; 64(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 23650766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survey of Voice Acoustic Parameters in Iranian Female Teachers.
Mohseni R; Sandoughdar N
J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):507.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26275636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of vocal tract discomfort scale results with objective and instrumental phoniatric parameters among teacher rehabilitees from voice disorders].
Woźnicka E; Niebudek-Bogusz E; Wiktorowicz J; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
Med Pr; 2013; 64(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 23829064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vocal Changes of Men and Women from Different Age Decades: An Analysis from 30 Years of Age.
Oliveira Santos A; Godoy J; Silverio K; Brasolotto A
J Voice; 2023 Nov; 37(6):840-850. PubMed ID: 34284927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) as a Screening Tool for Voice Disorders: Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores.
Awan SN; Roy N; Zhang D; Cohen SM
J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 26361215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
