These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24645623)

  • 21. Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis.
    Sato JR; Fujita A; Cardoso EF; Thomaz CE; Brammer MJ; Amaro E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1444-55. PubMed ID: 20472076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Recovering directed networks in neuroimaging datasets using partially conditioned Granger causality.
    Wu GR; Liao W; Stramaglia S; Chen H; Marinazzo D
    Brain Connect; 2013; 3(3):294-301. PubMed ID: 23530810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multivariate Granger causality analysis of fMRI data.
    Deshpande G; LaConte S; James GA; Peltier S; Hu X
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1361-73. PubMed ID: 18537116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI.
    Roebroeck A; Formisano E; Goebel R
    Neuroimage; 2005 Mar; 25(1):230-42. PubMed ID: 15734358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantification of effective connectivity in the brain using a measure of directed information.
    Liu Y; Aviyente S
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():635103. PubMed ID: 22675401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of spike sorting error on the Granger causality index.
    Shao PC; Tseng WT; Kuo CC; Shann WC; Tsai ML; Yen CC
    Neural Netw; 2013 Oct; 46():249-59. PubMed ID: 23845518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is Granger causality a viable technique for analyzing fMRI data?
    Wen X; Rangarajan G; Ding M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e67428. PubMed ID: 23861763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Constructing fMRI connectivity networks: a whole brain functional parcellation method for node definition.
    Maggioni E; Tana MG; Arrigoni F; Zucca C; Bianchi AM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 May; 228():86-99. PubMed ID: 24675050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Frequency decomposition of conditional Granger causality and application to multivariate neural field potential data.
    Chen Y; Bressler SL; Ding M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Jan; 150(2):228-37. PubMed ID: 16099512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating Brain Connectivity With Varying-Length Time Lags Using a Recurrent Neural Network.
    Wang Y; Lin K; Qi Y; Lian Q; Feng S; Wu Z; Pan G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 65(9):1953-1963. PubMed ID: 29993397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Wiener-Granger causality for effective connectivity in the hidden states: Indication from probabilistic causality: Comment on “Foundational perspectives on causality in large-scale brain net"orks" by M. Mannino and S.L. Bressler.
    Tang W
    Phys Life Rev; 2015 Dec; 15():128-9. PubMed ID: 26603766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of latent confounders in directed network analysis in neuroscience.
    Ramb R; Eichler M; Ing A; Thiel M; Weiller C; Grebogi C; Schwarzbauer C; Timmer J; Schelter B
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2013 Aug; 371(1997):20110612. PubMed ID: 23858480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing the strength of directed influences among neural signals: an approach to noisy data.
    Sommerlade L; Thiel M; Mader M; Mader W; Timmer J; Platt B; Schelter B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 239():47-64. PubMed ID: 25256644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A self-organized recurrent neural network for estimating the effective connectivity and its application to EEG data.
    Abbasvandi Z; Nasrabadi AM
    Comput Biol Med; 2019 Jul; 110():93-107. PubMed ID: 31132528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Frequency-based approach to the study of semantic brain networks connectivity.
    Bianchi AM; Marchetta E; Tana MG; Tettamanti M; Rizzo G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Jan; 212(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 23085280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Granger causality and information flow in multivariate processes.
    Blinowska KJ; Kuś R; Kamiński M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Nov; 70(5 Pt 1):050902. PubMed ID: 15600583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimation of direct nonlinear effective connectivity using information theory and multilayer perceptron.
    Khadem A; Hossein-Zadeh GA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 May; 229():53-67. PubMed ID: 24751646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality.
    Dhamala M; Rangarajan G; Ding M
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jun; 41(2):354-62. PubMed ID: 18394927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Statistical analysis of single-trial Granger causality spectra.
    Brovelli A
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():697610. PubMed ID: 22649482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Joint learning of multiple Granger causal networks via non-convex regularizations: Inference of group-level brain connectivity.
    Manomaisaowapak P; Songsiri J
    Neural Netw; 2022 May; 149():157-171. PubMed ID: 35240427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.