These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24645691)

  • 21. Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
    Neely JG; Sharon JD; Graboyes EM; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Grindler DJ; Dassopoulos T;
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):804-12. PubMed ID: 24098005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Applications of propensity score methods in observational comparative effectiveness and safety research: where have we come and where should we go?
    Borah BJ; Moriarty JP; Crown WH; Doshi JA
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Jan; 3(1):63-78. PubMed ID: 24266593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Matching study designs to disability-related comparative effectiveness research questions.
    Ballou J; Rich E; Kehn M
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Jan; 2(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 24236522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating methodological assumptions in comparative effectiveness research: overcoming pitfalls.
    Alemayehu D; Cappelleri JC
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Jan; 3(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 24345258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. "Lies, damned lies ..." and observational studies in comparative effectiveness research.
    Albert RK
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Jun; 187(11):1173-7. PubMed ID: 23725614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implementation research: a critical component of realizing the benefits of comparative effectiveness research.
    Atkins D; Kupersmith J
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e38-45. PubMed ID: 21184866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The relevance of head-to-head trials to patient-centred clinical research].
    Lehmacher W; Wolff S
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(9):639-45. PubMed ID: 22152420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The critical role of observational evidence in comparative effectiveness research.
    Fleurence RL; Naci H; Jansen JP
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Oct; 29(10):1826-33. PubMed ID: 20921482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Decision support tools to optimize economic outcomes for type 2 diabetes.
    Shaya FT; Chirikov VV
    Am J Manag Care; 2011 Nov; 17 Suppl 14():S377-83. PubMed ID: 22214425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quasi-random reflections on randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research.
    Goodman SN
    Clin Trials; 2012 Feb; 9(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 22334465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Scientific and organizational collaboration in comparative effectiveness research: the VA cooperative studies program model.
    Huang GD; Ferguson RE; Peduzzi PN; O'Leary TJ
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e24-31. PubMed ID: 21184863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Some methodological points to consider when performing systematic reviews in comparative effectiveness research.
    Berlin JA; Cepeda MS
    Clin Trials; 2012 Feb; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 22049086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Translating comparative effectiveness into practice: the case of diabetes medications.
    Shah ND; Mullan RJ; Breslin M; Yawn BP; Ting HH; Montori VM
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S153-8. PubMed ID: 20473211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative effectiveness research: moving medical oncology forward.
    Hirsch BR; Zafar SY
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 24314342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Innovative designs of point-of-care comparative effectiveness trials.
    Shih MC; Turakhia M; Lai TL
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):61-8. PubMed ID: 26099528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Norris SL; Atkins D; Bruening W; Fox S; Johnson E; Kane R; Morton SC; Oremus M; Ospina M; Randhawa G; Schoelles K; Shekelle P; Viswanathan M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1178-86. PubMed ID: 21636246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality improvement and comparative effectiveness: a review for the pediatric hospitalist.
    Manicone PE; Beck J
    Pediatr Clin North Am; 2014 Aug; 61(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 25084718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Different name, same meaning? Comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research in the USA].
    Gerhardus A
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(7):479-83. PubMed ID: 22981023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Oncology training programs: are we doing comparative effectiveness research justice?
    Zaorsky NG; Showalter TN
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Nov; 2(6):573-82. PubMed ID: 24236796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Maximizing the clinical utility of comparative effectiveness research.
    Umscheid CA
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Dec; 88(6):876-9. PubMed ID: 20962776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.