339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24646115)
41. The effectiveness of computerized anesthesia in primary mandibular molar pulpotomy: A randomized controlled trial.
Alamoudi NM; Baghlaf KK; Elashiry EA; Farsi NM; El Derwi DA; Bayoumi AM
Quintessence Int; 2016 Mar; 47(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 26504907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Evaluation of the injection pain with the use of DentalVibe injection system during supraperiosteal anaesthesia in children: a randomised clinical trial.
Şermet Elbay Ü; Elbay M; Yıldırım S; Kaya E; Kaya C; Uğurluel C; Baydemİr C
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 26(5):336-45. PubMed ID: 26369274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A clinician guide to patients afraid of dental injections and numbness.
Armfield JM; Milgrom P
SAAD Dig; 2011 Jan; 27():33-9. PubMed ID: 21323034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Is it the injection device or the anxiety experienced that causes pain during dental local anaesthesia?
Kuscu OO; Akyuz S
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Mar; 18(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 18237297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Anesthetic efficacy of the periodontal ligament injection after an inferior alveolar nerve block.
Childers M; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
J Endod; 1996 Jun; 22(6):317-20. PubMed ID: 8934993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Anaesthetic efficacy of supplemental lingual infiltration of mandibular molars after inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Dou L; Luo J; Yang D
Int Endod J; 2013 Jul; 46(7):660-5. PubMed ID: 23331081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of pain perception between computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery and the conventional syringe for inferior alveolar nerve block in children.
Shetty S; Dalvi S; Katge F; Patil D; Chimata VK; Shetty A
Dent Med Probl; 2022; 59(4):523-529. PubMed ID: 36480788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Articaine buccal infiltration enhances the effectiveness of lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 19228214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Efficacy of supplementary buccal infiltrations and intraligamentary injections to inferior alveolar nerve blocks in mandibular first molars with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized controlled trial.
Parirokh M; Sadr S; Nakhaee N; Abbott PV; Askarifard S
Int Endod J; 2014 Oct; 47(10):926-33. PubMed ID: 24359138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Intraligamentary anesthesia using a pressure syringe. A clinical study].
Alexandridis C; Stefanou E
Odontostomatol Proodos; 1985; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 3939463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. RCT on the effectiveness of the intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block on pain during dental treatment.
Youssef BR; Söhnel A; Welk A; Abudrya MH; Baider M; Alkilzy M; Splieth C
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):4825-4832. PubMed ID: 33527192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of articaine 4% and lidocaine 2% in paediatric dental patients.
Ram D; Amir E
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2006 Jul; 16(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 16759322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Pain perception and utility: a comparison of the syringe and computerized local injection techniques.
Nicholson JW; Berry TG; Summitt JB; Yuan CH; Witten TM
Gen Dent; 2001; 49(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 12004696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Ex vivo evaluation of side-perforated needles by injection of anesthetic solutions into the mandibular bone and the periodontal ligament of pigs.
Pertot WJ; Rieu R; Fuseri J; Proust JP
J Endod; 1992 Mar; 18(3):100-3. PubMed ID: 19186428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A comparative evaluation of pain and anxiety levels in 2 different anesthesia techniques: locoregional anesthesia using conventional syringe versus intraosseous anesthesia using a computer-controlled system (Quicksleeper).
Özer S; Yaltirik M; Kirli I; Yargic I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Nov; 114(5 Suppl):S132-9. PubMed ID: 23063389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in block and infiltration anesthesia administered in teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Ashraf H; Kazem M; Dianat O; Noghrehkar F
J Endod; 2013 Jan; 39(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 23228249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of Gow-Gates mandibular conduction anesthesia, Vazirani-Akinosi technique, buccal-plus-lingual infiltrations, and conventional inferior alveolar nerve anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Kabi D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 20123413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Computer-controlled Intraligamentary local anaesthesia in extraction of mandibular primary molars: randomised controlled clinical trial.
Helmy RH; Zeitoun SI; El-Habashy LM
BMC Oral Health; 2022 May; 22(1):194. PubMed ID: 35596166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Single-tooth anesthesia: pressure-sensing technology provides innovative advancement in the field of dental local anesthesia.
Hochman MN
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Apr; 28(4):186-8, 190, 192-3. PubMed ID: 17487044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. An Investigation into Dental Local Anaesthesia Teaching in United Kingdom Dental Schools.
Oliver G; DavidD A; Bell C; Robb N
SAAD Dig; 2016 Jan; 32():7-13. PubMed ID: 27145553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
