BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24646345)

  • 1. The evolutionary history of holometabolous insects inferred from transcriptome-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data.
    Peters RS; Meusemann K; Petersen M; Mayer C; Wilbrandt J; Ziesmann T; Donath A; Kjer KM; Aspöck U; Aspöck H; Aberer A; Stamatakis A; Friedrich F; Hünefeld F; Niehuis O; Beutel RG; Misof B
    BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 14(1):52. PubMed ID: 24646345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Strepsiptera problem: phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology.
    Whiting MF; Carpenter JC; Wheeler QD; Wheeler WC
    Syst Biol; 1997 Mar; 46(1):1-68. PubMed ID: 11975347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An integrative phylogenomic approach to elucidate the evolutionary history and divergence times of Neuropterida (Insecta: Holometabola).
    Vasilikopoulos A; Misof B; Meusemann K; Lieberz D; Flouri T; Beutel RG; Niehuis O; Wappler T; Rust J; Peters RS; Donath A; Podsiadlowski L; Mayer C; Bartel D; Böhm A; Liu S; Kapli P; Greve C; Jepson JE; Liu X; Zhou X; Aspöck H; Aspöck U
    BMC Evol Biol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):64. PubMed ID: 32493355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-copy nuclear genes resolve the phylogeny of the holometabolous insects.
    Wiegmann BM; Trautwein MD; Kim JW; Cassel BK; Bertone MA; Winterton SL; Yeates DK
    BMC Biol; 2009 Jun; 7():34. PubMed ID: 19552814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Morphological and molecular evidence converge upon a robust phylogeny of the megadiverse Holometabola.
    Beutel RG; Friedrich F; Hörnschemeyer T; Pohl H; Hünefeld F; Beckmann F; Meier R; Misof B; Whiting MF; Vilhelmsen L
    Cladistics; 2011 Aug; 27(4):341-355. PubMed ID: 34875787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gene Selection and Evolutionary Modeling Affect Phylogenomic Inference of Neuropterida Based on Transcriptome Data.
    Wang Y; Zhou X; Wang L; Liu X; Yang D; Rokas A
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Mar; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 30832228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is the phylogenetic signal limit from mitogenomes? The reconciliation between mitochondrial and nuclear data in the Insecta class phylogeny.
    Talavera G; Vila R
    BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Oct; 11():315. PubMed ID: 22032248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phylogenetic relationships among insect orders based on three nuclear protein-coding gene sequences.
    Ishiwata K; Sasaki G; Ogawa J; Miyata T; Su ZH
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2011 Feb; 58(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 21075208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The morphology and evolution of the female postabdomen of Holometabola (Insecta).
    Hünefeld F; Missbach C; Beutel RG
    Arthropod Struct Dev; 2012 Jul; 41(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 22583791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The first mitochondrial genome for the fishfly subfamily Chauliodinae and implications for the higher phylogeny of Megaloptera.
    Wang Y; Liu X; Winterton SL; Yang D
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47302. PubMed ID: 23056623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patterns of morphological simplification and innovation in the megadiverse Holometabola (Insecta).
    Beutel RG; Friedrich F; Economo EP
    Cladistics; 2022 Apr; 38(2):227-245. PubMed ID: 35277893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Morphology of the Wing Base Structure Illuminates Higher-Level Phylogeny of Holometabola.
    Zhao C; Huang M; Yang D; Liu X
    Insects; 2024 Mar; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 38535394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ribosomal protein genes of holometabolan insects reject the Halteria, instead revealing a close affinity of Strepsiptera with Coleoptera.
    Longhorn SJ; Pohl HW; Vogler AP
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2010 Jun; 55(3):846-59. PubMed ID: 20348001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 18S rDNA sequences and the holometabolous insects.
    Carmean D; Kimsey LS; Berbee ML
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1992 Dec; 1(4):270-8. PubMed ID: 1342942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative mitogenomics of Braconidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera) and the phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial genomes with special reference to Holometabolous insects.
    Wei SJ; Shi M; Sharkey MJ; van Achterberg C; Chen XX
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Jun; 11():371. PubMed ID: 20537196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 9-genes reinforce the phylogeny of holometabola and yield alternate views on the phylogenetic placement of Strepsiptera.
    McKenna DD; Farrell BD
    PLoS One; 2010 Jul; 5(7):e11887. PubMed ID: 20686704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Goodbye Halteria? The thoracic morphology of Endopterygota (Insecta) and its phylogenetic implications.
    Friedrich F; Beutel RG
    Cladistics; 2010 Dec; 26(6):579-612. PubMed ID: 34879598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematics of holometabolous insect orders based on 18S ribosomal RNA.
    Pashley DP; McPheron BA; Zimmer EA
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1993 Jun; 2(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 8025720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strepsiptera, phylogenomics and the long branch attraction problem.
    Boussau B; Walton Z; Delgado JA; Collantes F; Beani L; Stewart IJ; Cameron SA; Whitfield JB; Johnston JS; Holland PW; Bachtrog D; Kathirithamby J; Huelsenbeck JP
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e107709. PubMed ID: 25272037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contribution to understanding the evolution of holometaboly: transformation of internal head structures during the metamorphosis in the green lacewing Chrysopa pallens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae).
    Zhao C; Ang Y; Wang M; Gao C; Zhang K; Tang C; Liu X; Li M; Yang D; Meier R
    BMC Evol Biol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):79. PubMed ID: 32600301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.