These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24646370)

  • 1. Rational hypocrisy: a Bayesian analysis based on informal argumentation and slippery slopes.
    Rai TS; Holyoak KJ
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(7):1456-67. PubMed ID: 24646370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Punishing hypocrisy: the roles of hypocrisy and moral emotions in deciding culpability and punishment of criminal and civil moral transgressors.
    Laurent SM; Clark BA; Walker S; Wiseman KD
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(1):59-83. PubMed ID: 23725235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Power increases hypocrisy: moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior.
    Lammers J; Stapel DA; Galinsky AD
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):737-44. PubMed ID: 20483854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian argumentation and the value of logical validity.
    Eva B; Hartmann S
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Oct; 125(5):806-821. PubMed ID: 30024177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New Paradigms in the Psychology of Reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2020 Jan; 71():305-330. PubMed ID: 31514580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moral hypocrisy: addressing some alternatives.
    Batson CD; Thompson ER; Chen H
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Aug; 83(2):330-9. PubMed ID: 12150231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analogical and category-based inference: a theoretical integration with Bayesian causal models.
    Holyoak KJ; Lee HS; Lu H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Nov; 139(4):702-27. PubMed ID: 21038985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of anger, guilt, and envy on moral hypocrisy.
    Polman E; Ruttan RL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Jan; 38(1):129-39. PubMed ID: 21918064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Slippery slopes and moral reasoning.
    Devettere RJ
    J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 1463885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem arguments.
    Lillo-Unglaube M; Canales-Johnson A; Navarrete G; Bravo CF
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1420. PubMed ID: 25566112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance.
    Oaksford M; Hahn U
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2004 Jun; 58(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 15285597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Argumentation-Based Analysis of the Simonshaven Case.
    Prakken H
    Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Oct; 12(4):1068-1091. PubMed ID: 30873711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-Faced Morality: Distrust Promotes Divergent Moral Standards for the Self Versus Others.
    Weiss A; Burgmer P; Mussweiler T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1712-1724. PubMed ID: 29804510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What drives disagreement about moral hypocrisy? Perceived comparability and how people exploit it to criticize enemies and defend allies.
    Silver I; Berman JZ
    Cognition; 2024 Jun; 247():105773. PubMed ID: 38564850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change.
    Haigh M; Wood JS; Stewart AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):819-36. PubMed ID: 26886759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discounting testimony with the argument ad hominem and a Bayesian congruent prior model.
    Bhatia JS; Oaksford M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1548-59. PubMed ID: 26147667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethical decision making in nurses. Relationships among moral reasoning, coping style, and ethics stress.
    Raines ML
    JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 2000 Mar; 2(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 10824015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans.
    Walton D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Dec; 23(6):1507-1528. PubMed ID: 28000092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.