These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24646547)

  • 21. Comparison of treatment effect estimates of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin between observational studies using propensity score methods and randomized controlled trials.
    Li G; Holbrook A; Jin Y; Zhang Y; Levine MA; Mbuagbaw L; Witt DM; Crowther M; Connolly S; Chai-Adisaksopha C; Wan Z; Cheng J; Thabane L
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 31(6):541-61. PubMed ID: 27370013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Significance of prospective multicenter observational studies for gaining knowledge in surgery].
    Gastinger I; Koch A; Marusch F; Schmidt U; Köckerling F; Lippert H
    Chirurg; 2002 Feb; 73(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 11974480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Meta-analysis of small randomized controlled trials in surgery may be unreliable.
    Rerkasem K; Rothwell PM
    Br J Surg; 2010 Apr; 97(4):466-9. PubMed ID: 20155790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of prospective randomized clinical trials in pediatric surgery: state of the art?
    Moss RL; Henry MC; Dimmitt RA; Rangel S; Geraghty N; Skarsgard ED
    J Pediatr Surg; 2001 Aug; 36(8):1182-6. PubMed ID: 11479852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison between treatment effects in a randomised controlled trial and an observational study using propensity scores in primary care.
    Stuart BL; Grebel LE; Butler CC; Hood K; Verheij TJM; Little P
    Br J Gen Pract; 2017 Sep; 67(662):e643-e649. PubMed ID: 28760739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Value of Propensity Score Matching to Study Surgical Outcomes.
    Hwang ES; Wang X
    Ann Surg; 2017 Mar; 265(3):457-458. PubMed ID: 28045717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies.
    Papanikolaou PN; Christidi GD; Ioannidis JP
    CMAJ; 2006 Feb; 174(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 16505459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of atenolol on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after noncardiac surgery.
    Devereaux PJ; Ghali WA
    N Engl J Med; 1997 May; 336(20):1452-3; author reply 1453-4. PubMed ID: 9148147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adjusted Analyses in Studies Addressing Therapy and Harm: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.
    Agoritsas T; Merglen A; Shah ND; O'Donnell M; Guyatt GH
    JAMA; 2017 Feb; 317(7):748-759. PubMed ID: 28241362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Magnitude and direction of missing confounders had different consequences on treatment effect estimation in propensity score analysis.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Fontaine C; Daurès JP; Devereaux PJ; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():87-97. PubMed ID: 28412467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Evidence based surgery: ethical and methodological aspects].
    Kinnaert P
    Rev Med Brux; 2006; 27(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 17144645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Observational studies using propensity score analysis underestimated the effect sizes in critical care medicine.
    Zhang Z; Ni H; Xu X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):932-9. PubMed ID: 24774469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methylene blue: between scylla (meta-analysis) and charybdis (propensity).
    Landoni G; Pasin L; Di Prima AL; Dossi R; Taddeo D; Zangrillo A
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Apr; 28(2):e12-3. PubMed ID: 24630472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combining propensity score-based stratification and weighting to improve causal inference in the evaluation of health care interventions.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):1065-71. PubMed ID: 25266868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Propensity Score Matching: Retrospective Randomization?
    Jupiter DC
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(2):417-420. PubMed ID: 28231973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Propensity score analysis with missing data.
    Cham H; West SG
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):427-45. PubMed ID: 26962757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Propensity Score: an Alternative Method of Analyzing Treatment Effects.
    Kuss O; Blettner M; Börgermann J
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2016 Sep; 113(35-36):597-603. PubMed ID: 27658473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Propensity scores: an introduction and experimental test.
    Luellen JK; Shadish WR; Clark MH
    Eval Rev; 2005 Dec; 29(6):530-58. PubMed ID: 16244051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions.
    Hannink G; Gooszen HG; Rovers MM
    Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 23407296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Non-inferiority and equivalence trials.
    Ranstam J; Cook JA
    Br J Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(11):1578-1579. PubMed ID: 28895139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.