177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2464806)
1. Usefulness of rate responsive atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Hatano K; Kato R; Hayashi H; Noda S; Sotobata I; Murase M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Jan; 12(1 Pt 1):16-24. PubMed ID: 2464806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL
Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of automatic mode change between DDD and AAI to facilitate native atrioventricular conduction in patients with sick sinus syndrome or transient atrioventricular block.
Mayumi H; Kohno H; Yasui H; Kawachi Y; Tokunaga K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1740-7. PubMed ID: 8945033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the pacing rate on the atrioventricular conduction time during aerobic and anaerobic exercise: basic concepts for a dromotropically controlled rate responsive pacemaker.
Meine M; Hexamer M; Werner J; Israel CW; Mügge A; Lemke B; Barmeyer J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1782-91. PubMed ID: 10642132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AAI pacing mode: when is it indicated and how should it be achieved?
Katritsis D; Camm AJ
Clin Cardiol; 1993 Apr; 16(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 8458114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Atrial pacing for sick sinus syndrome.
Rosenqvist M
Clin Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 13(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 2404646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atrial adaptive rate pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects on exercise capacity and arrhythmias.
Haywood GA; Katritsis D; Ward J; Leigh-Jones M; Ward DE; Camm AJ
Br Heart J; 1993 Feb; 69(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8435244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new principle of rate adaptive pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Irnich W; Conrady J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1823-8. PubMed ID: 2463553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of the optimal atrioventricular interval in sick sinus syndrome during DDD pacing.
Kato M; Dote K; Sasaki S; Goto K; Takemoto H; Habara S; Hasegawa D; Matsuda O
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Sep; 28(9):892-7. PubMed ID: 16176525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The chronotropic response of the sinus node to exercise: a new method of analysis and a study of pacemaker patients.
Crook B; Nijhof P; van der Kemp P; Jennison C
Eur Heart J; 1995 Jul; 16(7):993-8. PubMed ID: 7498217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between atrioventricular delay and oxygen consumption in patients with sick sinus syndrome: relevance to rate responsive pacing.
Meine M; Hexamer M; Werner J; Israel CW; Lemke B; Barmeyer J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 22(7):1054-63. PubMed ID: 10456634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stability of AV conduction in sick sinus node syndrome patients with implanted atrial pacemakers.
Hayes DL; Furman S
Am Heart J; 1984 Apr; 107(4):644-7. PubMed ID: 6702557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefits of dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
Mitsuoka T; Kenny RA; Yeung TA; Chan SL; Perrins JE; Sutton R
Br Heart J; 1988 Oct; 60(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 3056477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chronotropic response of an activity detecting pacemaker compared with the normal sinus node.
Moura PJ; Gessman LJ; Lai T; Gallagher JD; White M; Morse DP
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Jan; 10(1 Pt 1):78-86. PubMed ID: 2436172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Atrioventricular conduction and permanent atrial pacing].
Medzevicius A; Medzeviciene V
Medicina (Kaunas); 2002; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12474716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits of rate-responsive pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Nishino M; Ito T; Miyawaki M; Nakagawa T; Kuryu T; Tanahashi H; Yamada Y; Abe H
Angiology; 1994 May; 45(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 8172382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence and significance of chronotropic incompetence in patients with indications for primary pacemaker implantation or pacemaker replacement.
Lukl J; Doupal V; Sovová E; Lubena L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Sep; 22(9):1284-91. PubMed ID: 10527009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
