177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2464806)
21. [Benefits and limits of single chamber atrial pacing with adaptive rate].
Pouillot C; Mabo P; Lelong B; Cazeau S; Paillard F; de Place C; Daubert JC
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1990 Nov; 83(12):1833-42. PubMed ID: 2125194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Atrial inhibited pacing in the sick sinus node syndrome: clinical value and the demand for rate responsiveness.
Kallryd A; Kruse I; Rydén L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Jun; 12(6):954-61. PubMed ID: 2472623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.
Masumoto H; Ueda Y; Kato R; Usui A; Maseki T; Takagi Y; Usui M
Europace; 2004 Sep; 6(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 15294270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Respiratory-dependent atrial pacing, management of sinus node disease.
Rognoni G; Bolognese L; Aina F; Occhetta E; Magnani A; Rossi P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1853-9. PubMed ID: 2463558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effective Management of Atrioventricular Interval for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation That Developed After DDDR Pacemaker Implantation in a Sick Sinus Syndrome Patient.
Tasaki H; Ashizawa N; Nagao S; Fukushima K; Furukawa R; Fukae S; Maemura K
Int Heart J; 2015; 56(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 26370366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Transesophageal programmed atrial pacing as a method of selecting patients with sick sinus syndrome for permanent atrial pacing.
Swiatecka G; Lubiński A; Raczak G; Stanke A; Juzwa A; Kubica J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1655-61. PubMed ID: 2463528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Neuroendocrine and haemodynamic changes in single-lead atrial pacing and dual-chamber pacing modes.
Zhang YY; Wu DY; Fu NK; Lu FM; Xu J
J Int Med Res; 2013 Aug; 41(4):1057-66. PubMed ID: 23816931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Atrial rate adaptive pacing: what happens to AV conduction?
Linde C; Nordlander R; Rosenqvist M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Oct; 17(10):1581-9. PubMed ID: 7800559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Radionuclide evaluation of dual chamber pacing: comparison between variable AV intervals and ventricular pacing.
Leman RB; Kratz JM
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1985 May; 8(3 Pt 1):408-14. PubMed ID: 2582391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Chronotropic competence in patients with the sick sinus syndrome wearing AAI or DDD pacemakers].
Goicolea de Oro A; Márquez L; López Gil M; Kallmeyer C; Chicote R; García-Cosío F
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1993 Jun; 46(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 8316699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Non-physiological increase of AV conduction time in sinus disease patients programmed in AAIR-based pacing mode.
Mabo P; Cebron JP; Solnon A; Tassin A; Graindorge L; Gras D
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2012 Nov; 35(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 22836479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence.
Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F
G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Minimizing right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node disease and prolonged PQ interval: The impact on exercise capacity.
Krzyżanowski K; Michałkiewicz D; Orski Z; Wierzbowski R; Ryczek R; Cwetsch A
Cardiol J; 2015; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 24846513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. AV block and changes in pacing mode during long-term follow-up of 399 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with an AAI/AAIR pacemaker.
Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Pedersen AK; Mortensen PT; Andersen HR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Mar; 24(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 11310306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [The influence of A-V synchrony and changes in heart rate on rate responsive pacing].
Sakakibara S
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Oct; 38(10):2076-84. PubMed ID: 2266282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of the chronotropic response at the anaerobic threshold: an objective measure of chronotropic function.
Meine M; Achtelik M; Hexamer M; Kloppe A; Werner J; Trappe HJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Oct; 23(10 Pt 1):1457-67. PubMed ID: 11060865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Preserving normal ventricular activation versus atrioventricular delay optimization during pacing: the role of intrinsic atrioventricular conduction and pacing rate.
Iliev II; Yamachika S; Muta K; Hayano M; Ishimatsu T; Nakao K; Komiya N; Hirata T; Ueyama C; Yano K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 23(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 10666756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Regional myocardial blood flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to long-term single chamber atrial or dual chamber pacing--effect of pacing mode and rate.
Nielsen JC; Bøttcher M; Nielsen TT; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 May; 35(6):1453-61. PubMed ID: 10807447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of ventricular function in atrial rate adaptive versus dual chamber rate adaptive pacing during exercise.
Gallik DM; Guidry GW; Mahmarian JJ; Verani MS; Spencer WH
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 17(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 7513403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [30 years cardiac pacemaker therapy: a status evaluation].
Stangl K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H
Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):383-95. PubMed ID: 2198730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
