These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24648301)
1. A balanced procedure for the treatment of cluster-ligand interactions on gold phosphine systems in catalysis. Mollenhauer D; Gaston N J Comput Chem; 2014 May; 35(13):986-97. PubMed ID: 24648301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Heats of Formation of Medium-Sized Organic Compounds from Contemporary Electronic Structure Methods. Minenkov Y; Wang H; Wang Z; Sarathy SM; Cavallo L J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Aug; 13(8):3537-3560. PubMed ID: 28636351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A critical comparison of CH⋯π Herman KM; Aprà E; Xantheas SS Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2023 Feb; 25(6):4824-4838. PubMed ID: 36692338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calculations on noncovalent interactions and databases of benchmark interaction energies. Hobza P Acc Chem Res; 2012 Apr; 45(4):663-72. PubMed ID: 22225511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A thorough benchmark of density functional methods for general main group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions. Goerigk L; Grimme S Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2011 Apr; 13(14):6670-88. PubMed ID: 21384027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Big data benchmarking: how do DFT methods across the rungs of Jacob's ladder perform for a dataset of 122k CCSD(T) total atomization energies? Karton A Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 May; 26(20):14594-14606. PubMed ID: 38738470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comprehensive Thermochemical Benchmark Set of Realistic Closed-Shell Metal Organic Reactions. Dohm S; Hansen A; Steinmetz M; Grimme S; Checinski MP J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 May; 14(5):2596-2608. PubMed ID: 29565586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Density-functional approaches to noncovalent interactions: a comparison of dispersion corrections (DFT-D), exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) theory, and specialized functionals. Burns LA; Vázquez-Mayagoitia A; Sumpter BG; Sherrill CD J Chem Phys; 2011 Feb; 134(8):084107. PubMed ID: 21361527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Theoretical thermodynamics for large molecules: walking the thin line between accuracy and computational cost. Schwabe T; Grimme S Acc Chem Res; 2008 Apr; 41(4):569-79. PubMed ID: 18324790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Mindless" DFT Benchmarking. Korth M; Grimme S J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Apr; 5(4):993-1003. PubMed ID: 26609608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accurate calculation of the heats of formation for large main group compounds with spin-component scaled MP2 methods. Grimme S J Phys Chem A; 2005 Apr; 109(13):3067-77. PubMed ID: 16833631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CO oxidation catalyzed by a single gold atom: benchmark calculations and the performance of DFT methods. Fang HC; Li ZH; Fan KN Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2011 Aug; 13(29):13358-69. PubMed ID: 21713266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of London dispersion on the isomerization reactions of large organic molecules: a density functional benchmark study. Huenerbein R; Schirmer B; Moellmann J; Grimme S Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2010 Jul; 12(26):6940-8. PubMed ID: 20461239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cluster model for the ionic product of water: accuracy and limitations of common density functional methods. Svozil D; Jungwirth P J Phys Chem A; 2006 Jul; 110(29):9194-9. PubMed ID: 16854033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benchmark Databases for Nonbonded Interactions and Their Use To Test Density Functional Theory. Zhao Y; Truhlar DG J Chem Theory Comput; 2005 May; 1(3):415-32. PubMed ID: 26641508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How reliable is DFT in predicting relative energies of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon isomers? comparison of functionals from different rungs of jacob's ladder. Karton A J Comput Chem; 2017 Mar; 38(6):370-382. PubMed ID: 27859494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does DFT-D estimate accurate energies for the binding of ligands to metal complexes? Ryde U; Mata RA; Grimme S Dalton Trans; 2011 Nov; 40(42):11176-83. PubMed ID: 21853206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protein-ligand interaction energies with dispersion corrected density functional theory and high-level wave function based methods. Antony J; Grimme S; Liakos DG; Neese F J Phys Chem A; 2011 Oct; 115(41):11210-20. PubMed ID: 21842894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of density functional methods for reaction energetics: iridium-catalyzed water oxidation as case study. Kazaryan A; Baerends EJ J Comput Chem; 2013 Apr; 34(10):870-8. PubMed ID: 23281098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phosphine passivated gold clusters: how charge transfer affects electronic structure and stability. Mollenhauer D; Gaston N Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Nov; 18(43):29686-29697. PubMed ID: 27711516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]