115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24648305)
1. Value of general surgical risk models for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic resections for pancreatobiliary carcinomas.
Haga Y; Wada Y; Saitoh T; Takeuchi H; Ikejiri K; Ikenaga M
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2014 Aug; 21(8):599-606. PubMed ID: 24648305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive value of E-PASS and POSSUM systems for postoperative risk assessment of spinal surgery.
Hirose J; Taniwaki T; Fujimoto T; Okada T; Nakamura T; Okamoto N; Usuku K; Mizuta H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jan; 20(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 24206035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of general surgical risk models for predicting postoperative liver failure and mortality following liver surgery.
Haga Y; Ikejiri K; Takeuchi H; Ikenaga M; Wada Y
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 106(7):898-904. PubMed ID: 22605669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of E-PASS models for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma.
Haga Y; Miyamoto A; Wada Y; Takami Y; Takeuchi H
HPB (Oxford); 2016 Mar; 18(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 27017167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of operative morbidity after pancreatic resection.
Hashimoto D; Takamori H; Hirotaz M; Baba H
Hepatogastroenterology; 2013 Oct; 60(127):1577-82. PubMed ID: 24634925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. POSSUM accurately predicts morbidity for pancreatic resection.
Pratt W; Joseph S; Callery MP; Vollmer CM
Surgery; 2008 Jan; 143(1):8-19. PubMed ID: 18154928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of surgical outcome scores according to ISGPS definitions in patients undergoing pancreatic resection.
Knight BC; Kausar A; Manu M; Ammori BA; Sherlock DJ; O'Reilly DA
Dig Surg; 2010; 27(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 20938180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Value of PUSSOM and P-POSSUM for the prediction of surgical operative risk in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors].
Chen Y; Chu Y; Che X; Lan Z; Zhang J; Wang C
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Jun; 37(6):461-5. PubMed ID: 26463152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. POSSUM and P-POSSUM as predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery: a meta-analysis.
Chen T; Wang H; Wang H; Song Y; Li X; Wang J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2501-10. PubMed ID: 23435569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is an estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress able to predict operative morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy?
Hashimoto D; Takamori H; Sakamoto Y; Ikuta Y; Nakahara O; Furuhashi S; Tanaka H; Watanabe M; Beppu T; Hirota M; Baba H
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2010 Mar; 17(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 19430714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the POSSUM, P-POSSUM and E-PASS scores in the surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Wang H; Wang H; Chen T; Liang X; Song Y; Wang J
World J Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 12():191. PubMed ID: 24961847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of a Modified E-PASS and POSSUM System for Postoperative Risk Assessment in Patients with Spinal Disease.
Chun DH; Kim DY; Choi SK; Shin DA; Ha Y; Kim KN; Yoon DH; Yi S
World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 112():e95-e102. PubMed ID: 29277590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Value of E-PASS and mE-PASS in predicting morbidity and mortality of gastric cancer surgery].
Liu N; Cui J; Zhang Z; Zhao Z; Li W; Fu W
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 37(10):753-8. PubMed ID: 26813594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) for a surgical audit in elective digestive surgery.
Haga Y; Wada Y; Takeuchi H; Kimura O; Furuya T; Sameshima H; Ishikawa M
Surgery; 2004 Jun; 135(6):586-94. PubMed ID: 15179364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perioperative risk prediction in the era of enhanced recovery: a comparison of POSSUM, ACPGBI, and E-PASS scoring systems in major surgical procedures of the colorectal surgeon.
Bagnall NM; Pring ET; Malietzis G; Athanasiou T; Faiz OD; Kennedy RH; Jenkins JT
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1627-1634. PubMed ID: 30078107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity and its Portsmouth modification as predictors of post-operative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.
Wang H; Chen T; Wang H; Song Y; Li X; Wang J
Am J Surg; 2013 Apr; 205(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 23395580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frailty predicts risk of life-threatening complications and mortality after pancreatic resections.
Augustin T; Burstein MD; Schneider EB; Morris-Stiff G; Wey J; Chalikonda S; Walsh RM
Surgery; 2016 Oct; 160(4):987-996. PubMed ID: 27545992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. External Validation of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) Risk Model to Predict Operative Risk in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.
Coelen RJ; Olthof PB; van Dieren S; Besselink MG; Busch OR; van Gulik TM
JAMA Surg; 2016 Dec; 151(12):1132-1138. PubMed ID: 27579510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of E-PASS System for Postoperative Morbidity of Spinal Surgery.
Hirose J; Taniwaki T; Fujimoto T; Okada T; Nakamura T; Usuku K; Mizuta H
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Dec; 28(10):E595-600. PubMed ID: 24270578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of modified estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress in colorectal carcinoma surgery.
Haga Y; Wada Y; Ikenaga M; Takeuchi H; Ikejiri K
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Oct; 54(10):1293-300. PubMed ID: 21904145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
