456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24648388)
1. Semiparametric empirical likelihood confidence intervals for the difference of areas under two correlated ROC curves under density ratio model.
Zhang D; Zhang B
Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):678-96. PubMed ID: 24648388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.
Qin G; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):613-22. PubMed ID: 16918927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test at a fixed level of specificity.
Gengsheng Qin ; Davis AE; Jing BY
Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):217-31. PubMed ID: 19654172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using confidence intervals to compare several correlated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves.
Zou GY; Yue L
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(29):5077-90. PubMed ID: 23824874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of non-parametric confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
Gengsheng Qin ; Hotilovac L
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 18426855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A modified sign test for comparing paired ROC curves.
Braun TM; Alonzo TA
Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 17925302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Best combination of multiple diagnostic tests for screening purposes.
Qin J; Zhang B
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2905-19. PubMed ID: 20862668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.
Hillis SL
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2031-57. PubMed ID: 26608405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Smoothed empirical likelihood inference for ROC curve in the presence of missing biomarker values.
Cheng W; Tang N
Biom J; 2020 Jul; 62(4):1038-1059. PubMed ID: 31957095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures.
Pepe MS; Cai T
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):528-35. PubMed ID: 15180681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A semiparametric method for comparing the discriminatory ability of biomarkers subject to limit of detection.
Yin L; Diao G; Liu A
Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4141-4152. PubMed ID: 28744876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the use of partial area under the ROC curve for comparison of two diagnostic tests.
Ma H; Bandos AI; Gur D
Biom J; 2015 Mar; 57(2):304-20. PubMed ID: 25537143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Smooth semiparametric receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Wan S; Zhang B
Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2565-86. PubMed ID: 17072821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A model for adjusting for nonignorable verification bias in estimation of the ROC curve and its area with likelihood-based approach.
Liu D; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2010 Dec; 66(4):1119-28. PubMed ID: 20222937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Empirical likelihood inference for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve using ranked set samples.
Moon C; Wang X; Lim J
Pharm Stat; 2022 Nov; 21(6):1219-1245. PubMed ID: 35593451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
