177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24649738)
1. Health care operations activities that may constitute research: the Department of Veterans Affairs's perspective.
Tsan MF; Puglisi T
IRB; 2014; 36(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 24649738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Veterans Affairs is first to require IRB accreditation.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 May; 16(5):3. PubMed ID: 11833560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Veterans affairs still has human research problems.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Dec; 15(12):3. PubMed ID: 11789517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.
Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI
IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. VHA policy-related clinical ethical issues.
Phelps RA
HEC Forum; 1997 Jun; 9(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 10169720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
Wichman A
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancing protections for human participants in clinical and health services research: a continuing process.
Feussner JR; Burris JF; McGlynn G; Lavori PW
Med Care; 2002 Sep; 40(9 Suppl):V4-11. PubMed ID: 12226580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Achieving proper balance in research with decisionally-incapacitated subjects: NAMI's perspectives on the working group's proposal.
Flynn LM; Honberg RS
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):174-92. PubMed ID: 15573436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Regulating ethics in Australian healthcare research.
Cregan K
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2012 Jul; 21(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 22624541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bill of rights for research subjects.
Prentice ED; Reitemeier PJ; Antonson DL; Kelso TK; Jameton A
IRB; 1993; 15(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. HHS draft guidance on financial conflicts of interest.
Barnes M; Gallin K
IRB; 2003; 25(5):15-6. PubMed ID: 14870740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing the implementation of clinical guidelines.
Goldberg HI; McGough H
IRB; 1991; 13(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 11656109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of human subjects protection at CDC/ATSDR.
Santelli J; Ginn E; Speers MA
IRB; 2000; 22(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11883474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Protecting research subjects--what must be done.
Shalala D
N Engl J Med; 2000 Sep; 343(11):808-10. PubMed ID: 10984573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality improvement or research: a distinction without a difference?
Doezema D; Hauswald M
IRB; 2002; 24(4):9-12. PubMed ID: 13678030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the quality of human research protection programs: the experience at the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Tsan MF; Smith K; Gao B
IRB; 2010; 32(4):16-9. PubMed ID: 20853799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. New guidelines for protection of subjects who are prisoners.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jul; 18(7):3. PubMed ID: 15119337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A higher standard for human research.
Nat Med; 1999 Jun; 5(6):591. PubMed ID: 10371478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. United States regulatory requirements for research involving human subjects.
J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12739542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
