These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24650023)

  • 41. Surgically Relevant Morphological Parameters of Proximal Human Femur: A Statistical Analysis Based on 3D Reconstruction of CT Data.
    Soodmand E; Zheng G; Steens W; Bader R; Nolte L; Kluess D
    Orthop Surg; 2019 Feb; 11(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 30809957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Differences in anatomical parameters between the affected and unaffected hip in patients with bilateral cam-type deformities.
    Ng KCG; Lamontagne M; Beaulé PE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Mar; 33():13-19. PubMed ID: 26895447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Development of a three-dimensional detection method of cam deformities in femoroacetabular impingement.
    Audenaert EA; Baelde N; Huysse W; Vigneron L; Pattyn C
    Skeletal Radiol; 2011 Jul; 40(7):921-7. PubMed ID: 20714720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Basic concepts of femoral neck anteversion: comparison of two definitions.
    Høiseth A; Reikerås O; Fønstelien E
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Feb; 62(734):114-6. PubMed ID: 2924092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Femoral neck torsion angle measurement by computed tomography.
    Mesgarzadeh M; Revesz G; Bonakdarpour A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1987; 11(5):799-803. PubMed ID: 3655041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. CT assessment of asymptomatic hip joints for the background of femoroacetabular impingement morphology.
    Ergen FB; Vudalı S; Sanverdi E; Dolgun A; Aydıngöz Ü
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2014; 20(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 24378991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Radiological evidence of femoroacetabular impingement in mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a mean follow-up of 14.4 years after pinning in situ.
    Fraitzl CR; Käfer W; Nelitz M; Reichel H
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Dec; 89(12):1592-6. PubMed ID: 18057358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Femoroacetabular impingement and classification of the cam deformity: the reference interval in normal hips.
    Pollard TC; Villar RN; Norton MR; Fern ED; Williams MR; Simpson DJ; Murray DW; Carr AJ
    Acta Orthop; 2010 Feb; 81(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 20175650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Differences in Femoral Torsion Among Various Measurement Methods Increase in Hips With Excessive Femoral Torsion.
    Schmaranzer F; Lerch TD; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M; Steppacher SD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 May; 477(5):1073-1083. PubMed ID: 30624313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Femoroacetabular Impingement Is Associated With Sports-Related Posterior Hip Instability in Adolescents: A Matched-Cohort Study.
    Mayer SW; Abdo JC; Hill MK; Kestel LA; Pan Z; Novais EN
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Sep; 44(9):2299-303. PubMed ID: 27311413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cam type femoro-acetabular impingement: quantifying the diagnosis using three dimensional head-neck ratios.
    Masjedi M; Marquardt CS; Drummond IM; Harris SJ; Cobb JP
    Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Mar; 42(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 22678073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement.
    Rakhra KS; Sheikh AM; Allen D; Beaulé PE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 467(3):660-5. PubMed ID: 19037709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Validation of computerized tomography antetorsion angle measurement of the femur].
    Starker M; Hanusek S; Rittmeister M; Thoma W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(5):420-7. PubMed ID: 9823637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Remodelling of femoral head-neck junction in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a multicentre study.
    Akiyama M; Nakashima Y; Kitano T; Nakamura T; Takamura K; Kohno Y; Yamamoto T; Motomura G; Ohishi M; Hamai S; Iwamoto Y
    Int Orthop; 2013 Dec; 37(12):2331-6. PubMed ID: 24022736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Proposed Referential Index to Resect Femoroacetabular Cam-Type Impingement During Arthroscopy Using a Cadaveric Hip Model.
    Yamasaki S; Hashimoto Y; Terai S; Takigami J; Takahashi S; Nakamura H
    Arthroscopy; 2015 Jun; 31(6):1069-76. PubMed ID: 25703287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. What ape proximal femora tell us about femoroacetabular impingement: a comparison.
    Fikkers JT; Bouma HW; de Boer SF; Toogood PA; van Kampen PM; Hogervorst T
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1204-11. PubMed ID: 24980642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset.
    Ito K; Minka MA; Leunig M; Werlen S; Ganz R
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2001 Mar; 83(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 11284559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing.
    Beaulé PE; Harvey N; Zaragoza E; Le Duff MJ; Dorey FJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jan; 89(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 17259408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Anatomical and biomechanical investigations of the iliotibial tract.
    Birnbaum K; Siebert CH; Pandorf T; Schopphoff E; Prescher A; Niethard FU
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Dec; 26(6):433-46. PubMed ID: 15378277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The alpha angle in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement: new reference intervals based on 2038 healthy young adults.
    Laborie LB; Lehmann TG; Engesæter IØ; Sera F; Engesæter LB; Rosendahl K
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Apr; 96-B(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 24692609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.