These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24650089)

  • 1. 3-T magnetic resonance for determination of aortic valve area: a comparison to echocardiography.
    Speiser U; Quick S; Haas D; Youssef A; Waessnig NK; Ibrahim K; Strasser RH; Schoen S
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2014 Jun; 48(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 24650089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography.
    Malyar NM; Schlosser T; Barkhausen J; Gutersohn A; Buck T; Bartel T; Erbel R
    Cardiology; 2008; 109(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 17713328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vancraeynest D; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 17968960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in aortic valve area measured with CT planimetry and echocardiography (continuity equation) are related to divergent estimates of left ventricular outflow tract area.
    Halpern EJ; Mallya R; Sewell M; Shulman M; Zwas DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1668-73. PubMed ID: 19457833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Usefulness of 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity in routine clinical practice.
    Levy F; Iacuzio L; Civaia F; Rusek S; Dommerc C; Hugues N; Alexandrescu C; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2016 Nov; 109(11):618-625. PubMed ID: 27692661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques.
    Kupfahl C; Honold M; Meinhardt G; Vogelsberg H; Wagner A; Mahrholdt H; Sechtem U
    Heart; 2004 Aug; 90(8):893-901. PubMed ID: 15253962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation.
    Reant P; Lederlin M; Lafitte S; Serri K; Montaudon M; Corneloup O; Roudaut R; Laurent F
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 59(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 16873006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Tanaka K; Makaryus AN; Wolff SD
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 17891618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of the ellipsoid shape of the left ventricular outflow tract on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis.
    De Vecchi C; Caudron J; Dubourg B; Pirot N; Lefebvre V; Bauer F; Eltchaninoff H; Dacher JN
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 24582043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Westermann Y; Geigenmüller A; Elgeti T; Wagner M; Dushe S; Borges AC; Dohmen PM; Hein PA; Lembcke A
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 19783394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The complementary role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of patients with aortic stenosis.
    Thomas B; Freitas A; Ferreira R; Tavares NJ
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2005 Sep; 24(9):1117-21. PubMed ID: 16335285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of dual-source computed tomography for the quantification of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis versus transthoracic echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment.
    Ropers D; Ropers U; Marwan M; Schepis T; Pflederer T; Wechsel M; Klinghammer L; Flachskampf FA; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19932793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of stenotic aortic valve area: a comparative study.
    Dimitriou P; Kähäri A; Emilsson K; Thunberg P
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Nov; 53(9):995-1003. PubMed ID: 22983258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of left ventricular outflow geometry and aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional echocardiography.
    Saitoh T; Shiota M; Izumo M; Gurudevan SV; Tolstrup K; Siegel RJ; Shiota T
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1626-31. PubMed ID: 22440128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography].
    Morelli S; De Castro S; Cartoni D; Perrone C; Beni S; Bernardo ML; Ferrante L; Giordano M
    G Ital Cardiol; 1995 Jul; 25(7):851-7. PubMed ID: 7557034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of the aortic valve stenosis: an in vivo and ex vivo study.
    Buchner S; Debl K; Schmid FX; Luchner A; Djavidani B
    BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Aug; 15():34. PubMed ID: 26306577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aortic valve area, stroke volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling, and fibrosis in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between high and low gradient and normal and low flow aortic stenosis.
    Barone-Rochette G; Piérard S; Seldrum S; de Meester de Ravenstein C; Melchior J; Maes F; Pouleur AC; Vancraeynest D; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(6):1009-17. PubMed ID: 24100045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel approach to determine aortic valve area with phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Troger F; Lechner I; Reindl M; Tiller C; Holzknecht M; Pamminger M; Kremser C; Schwaiger J; Reinstadler SJ; Bauer A; Metzler B; Mayr A; Klug G
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2022 Jan; 24(1):7. PubMed ID: 34986847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance as a complementary method to transthoracic echocardiography for aortic valve area estimation in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Repanas TI; Papanastasiou CA; Efthimiadis GK; Fragkakis N; Sachpekidis V; Klein RM; Karvounis H; Karamitsos TD
    Hellenic J Cardiol; 2021; 62(2):107-111. PubMed ID: 32535246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.