161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24651026)
1. Editorial comment.
Jones JS
J Urol; 2014 Jun; 191(6):1754. PubMed ID: 24651026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Editorial comment.
Hadaschik BA; Kuru TH
J Urol; 2014 Jun; 191(6):1754. PubMed ID: 24651025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Words of wisdom. Re: Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: MRI/TRUS fusion-guided prostate biopsy.
Villers A
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1218-9. PubMed ID: 24774825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Re: Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy: A. R. Rastinehad, B. Turkbey, S. S. Salami, O. Yaskiv, A. K. George, M. Fakhoury, K. Beecher, M. A. Vira, L. R. Kavoussi, D. N. Siegel, R. Villani and E. Ben-Levi. J Urol 2014; 191: 1749-1754.
Patodia M; Goel A; Kumar M
J Urol; 2014 Dec; 192(6):1888; discussion 1888-9. PubMed ID: 25194541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy.
Rastinehad AR; Turkbey B; Salami SS; Yaskiv O; George AK; Fakhoury M; Beecher K; Vira MA; Kavoussi LR; Siegel DN; Villani R; Ben-Levi E
J Urol; 2014 Jun; 191(6):1749-54. PubMed ID: 24333515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Has magnetic resonance-guided biopsy of the prostate become the standard of care?
Emberton M
Eur Urol; 2013 Nov; 64(5):720-1. PubMed ID: 23845230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancer: MRI/US-guided biopsy--a viable alternative to TRUS-guidance.
van de Ven WJ; Barentsz JO
Nat Rev Urol; 2013 Oct; 10(10):559-60. PubMed ID: 23938941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: M. Minhaj Siddiqui, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Hong Truong, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy. Eur Urol 2013;64:713-9 and Re: Mark Emberton. Has magnetic resonance-guided biopsy of the prostate become the standard of care? Eur Urol 2013;64:720-1.
van den Bergh RC; van der Poel HG
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):e106-7. PubMed ID: 24411989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Editorial comment.
Labanaris AP
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):866. PubMed ID: 23261235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy.
Cash H; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Holzmann J; Asbach P; Haas M; Hinz S; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Günzel K; Kempkensteffen C
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 26293117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dismiss Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-guided and Embrace Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-informed Prostate Biopsy: Is the Paradigm Ready to Shift?
Giannarini G; Briganti A; Crestani A; Rossanese M; Montorsi F; Ficarra V
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):381-3. PubMed ID: 26070515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.
Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are men who are biopsied without prior prostate magnetic resonance imaging getting substandard care?
Emberton M
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):837-9. PubMed ID: 26542326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate cancer gene 3 assay in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasonography fusion target biopsy era: a future to believe in.
Rocco B; Boeri L
BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):672-673. PubMed ID: 27753467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. MR Imaging-Guided Free-Handed Core-Needle Biopsies in the Breast.
Lee CU
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):142-144. PubMed ID: 29258659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Using MR/Ultrasound-Fusion Guided Biopsy: Ending the "Needle in a Haystack" Conundrum?
Tombal BF; Van Nieuwenhove S; Lecouvet FE
JAMA Oncol; 2015 Sep; 1(6):831-2. PubMed ID: 26181913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Re: comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Lazzeri M; Lughezzani G; Guazzoni G
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):535-6. PubMed ID: 26282352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Words of wisdom: re: transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Ravery V
Eur Urol; 2013 Aug; 64(2):337. PubMed ID: 23830225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Natural History of Pathologically Benign Cancer Suspicious Regions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Following Targeted Biopsy.
Bryk DJ; Llukani E; Huang WC; Lepor H
J Urol; 2015 Nov; 194(5):1234-40. PubMed ID: 26003206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
