These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2465125)

  • 1. Neuromagnetic evidence of an amplitopic organization of the human auditory cortex.
    Pantev C; Hoke M; Lehnertz K; Lütkenhöner B
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989 Mar; 72(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 2465125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neuromagnetic evidence of functional organization of the auditory cortex in humans.
    Pantev C; Hoke M; Lütkenhöner B; Lehnertz K
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1991; 491():106-114; discussion 115. PubMed ID: 1814141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields.
    Pantev C; Hoke M; Lehnertz K; Lütkenhöner B; Anogianakis G; Wittkowski W
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988 Feb; 69(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 2446835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuromagnetic study of the auditory responses in right and left hemispheres of the human brain evoked by pure tones and speech sounds.
    Kuriki S; Murase M
    Exp Brain Res; 1989; 77(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 2792256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex.
    Romani GL; Williamson SJ; Kaufman L
    Science; 1982 Jun; 216(4552):1339-40. PubMed ID: 7079770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency.
    Roberts TP; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 1996 Apr; 7(6):1138-40. PubMed ID: 8817518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neuromagnetic steady-state responses to auditory stimuli.
    Hari R; Hämäläinen M; Joutsiniemi SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Sep; 86(3):1033-9. PubMed ID: 2794240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory responsive cortex in the squirrel monkey: neural responses to amplitude-modulated sounds.
    Bieser A; Müller-Preuss P
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 Mar; 108(2):273-84. PubMed ID: 8815035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurements of auditory and somatically evoked magnetic fields and localization of their dipole sources.
    Kuriki S; Isobe Y; Mizutani Y
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1989; 1(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 2486751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus duration influences the dipole location shift within the auditory evoked field component N100m.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Brain Topogr; 2002; 15(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 12371675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic anterolateral movement of N100m dipoles in evoked magnetic field reflects activation of isofrequency bands through horizontal fibers in human auditory cortex.
    Ozaki I; Jin YC; Suzuki Y; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Aug; 329(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 12165417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic fields from the auditory cortex of a deaf human individual occurring spontaneously or evoked by stimulation through a cochlear prosthesis.
    Hoke M; Pantev C; Lütkenhöner B; Lehnertz K; Sürth W
    Audiology; 1989; 28(3):152-70. PubMed ID: 2660775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Latency of evoked neuromagnetic M100 reflects perceptual and acoustic stimulus attributes.
    Roberts TP; Ferrari P; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 1998 Oct; 9(14):3265-9. PubMed ID: 9831462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of sources of brain neuronal activity with high spatiotemporal resolution through combination of neuromagnetic source localization (NMSL) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
    Pantev C; Hoke M; Lehnertz K; Lütkenhöner B; Fahrendorf G; Stöber U
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 Mar; 75(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 1689641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuromagnetic responses of human auditory cortex to interruptions in a steady rhythm.
    Hari R; Joutsiniemi SL; Hämäläinen M; Vilkman V
    Neurosci Lett; 1989 Apr; 99(1-2):164-8. PubMed ID: 2748007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of the human auditory cortex by the neuromagnetic method.
    Romani GL; Williamson SJ; Kaufman L; Brenner D
    Exp Brain Res; 1982; 47(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 7128708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Locating accuracy of a current source of neuromagnetic responses: simulation study for a single current dipole in a spherical conductor.
    Kuriki S; Murase M; Takeuchi F
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989 Dec; 73(6):499-506. PubMed ID: 2480884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Silent functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) of tonotopicity and stimulus intensity coding in human primary auditory cortex.
    Yetkin FZ; Roland PS; Christensen WF; Purdy PD
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Mar; 114(3):512-8. PubMed ID: 15091227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Responses of single neurons in posterior field of cat auditory cortex to tonal stimulation.
    Phillips DP; Orman SS
    J Neurophysiol; 1984 Jan; 51(1):147-63. PubMed ID: 6693932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.