These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

844 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24651335)

  • 1. Irrigation in endodontics.
    Haapasalo M; Shen Y; Wang Z; Gao Y
    Br Dent J; 2014 Mar; 216(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 24651335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of oxidative potential water as a root canal irrigant.
    Hata G; Hayami S; Weine FS; Toda T
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jun; 34(4):308-17. PubMed ID: 11482143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Root Canal Dentin Erosion after Different Irrigation Methods Using Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy.
    Wang Z; Maezono H; Shen Y; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1834-1839. PubMed ID: 27769680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Debris remaining in the apical third of root canals after chemomechanical preparation by using sodium hypochlorite and glyde: an in vivo study.
    Cruz A; Vera J; Gascón G; Palafox-Sánchez CA; Amezcua O; Mercado G
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1419-23. PubMed ID: 25146024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of final irrigant protocols for debris removal from simulated canal irregularities.
    Martins Justo A; Abreu da Rosa R; Santini MF; Cardoso Ferreira MB; Pereira JR; Húngaro Duarte MA; Reis Só MV
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2009-14. PubMed ID: 25266470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model.
    Andrabi SM; Kumar A; Zia A; Iftekhar H; Alam S; Siddiqui S
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Aug; 5(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 23595996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of smear layer removal protocols in curved root canals.
    Yeung W; Raldi DP; Cunha RS; Mello I
    Aust Endod J; 2014 Aug; 40(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 25244220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
    Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the antibacterial effect and smear layer removal using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming aided irrigation versus a conventional irrigation in single-rooted canals: an in vitro study.
    Zhu X; Yin X; Chang JW; Wang Y; Cheung GS; Zhang C
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2013 Aug; 31(8):371-7. PubMed ID: 23863104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of the debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root canal irrigation systems.
    Alkahtani A; Al Khudhairi TD; Anil S
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Feb; 14():12. PubMed ID: 24512441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of sodium hypochlorite mixed with etidronic acid during canal preparation increases debris extrusion.
    Tartari T; Wilchenski BS; de Souza Lima LA; Vivan RR; Ballal V; Duarte MAH
    Aust Endod J; 2023 Dec; 49(3):584-591. PubMed ID: 37571801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Light and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of Glyde File Prep in smear layer removal.
    Lim TS; Wee TY; Choi MY; Koh WC; Sae-Lim V
    Int Endod J; 2003 May; 36(5):336-43. PubMed ID: 12752647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An ex vivo evaluation of a new root canal irrigation technique with intracanal aspiration.
    Fukumoto Y; Kikuchi I; Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 16454788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study.
    Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of MTAD as a final rinse on removal of smear layer in ten-minute preparation time.
    Lotfi M; Vosoughhosseini S; Saghiri MA; Zand V; Ranjkesh B; Ghasemi N
    J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1391-4. PubMed ID: 22980185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of smear layer removal by EDTAC and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic agitation.
    Guerisoli DM; Marchesan MA; Walmsley AD; Lumley PJ; Pecora JD
    Int Endod J; 2002 May; 35(5):418-21. PubMed ID: 12059911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the EndoVac system and conventional needle irrigation on removal of the smear layer in primary molar root canals.
    Buldur B; Kapdan A
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1168-1174. PubMed ID: 29072242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation.
    Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
    J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):308-11. PubMed ID: 20113797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.