These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
854 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24651335)
21. Ex vivo evaluation of various instrumentation techniques and irrigants in reducing E. faecalis within root canals. Basmaci F; Oztan MD; Kiyan M Int Endod J; 2013 Sep; 46(9):823-30. PubMed ID: 23441862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy. Canoglu H; Tekcicek MU; Cehreli ZC Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 17249433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study. Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of 4% Sodium Hypochlorite in eliminating Enterococcus faecalis from the Root Canal when Used with Three Irrigation Methods: An in vitro Study. Priyank H; Pandey V; Bagul A; Majety KK; Verma P; Choudhury BK J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Mar; 18(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 28258267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Irrigants in non-surgical endodontic treatment. Regan JD; Fleury AA J Ir Dent Assoc; 2006; 52(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 16989370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of laser-activated irrigation of 1320-nanometer Nd:YAG laser on sealer penetration in curved root canals. Moon YM; Kim HC; Bae KS; Baek SH; Shon WJ; Lee W J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):531-5. PubMed ID: 22414844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution and gel for smear layer removal. Dotto SR; Travassos RM; de Oliveira EP; Machado ME; Martins JL Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 17697246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of Ultrasonic Activation of Irrigants on Smear Layer Removal. Schmidt TF; Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT; Pashley DH; Bortoluzzi EA J Endod; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1359-63. PubMed ID: 25960002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants. Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigating solutions: a comparative scanning electron microscope evaluation. Ahir B; Parekh V; Katyayan MK; Katyayan PA Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):617-22. PubMed ID: 25511062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of root canal taper on its cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopic study. Arvaniti IS; Khabbaz MG J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):871-4. PubMed ID: 21787508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of EDTA, sonic, and ultrasonic activation on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals: an in vitro study. de Gregorio C; Estevez R; Cisneros R; Heilborn C; Cohenca N J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):891-5. PubMed ID: 19482193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation. van der Sluis LW; Gambarini G; Wu MK; Wesselink PR Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 16674742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cleaning effectiveness of root canal irrigation with electrochemically activated anolyte and catholyte solutions: a pilot study. Solovyeva AM; Dummer PM Int Endod J; 2000 Nov; 33(6):494-504. PubMed ID: 11307252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of three different irrigating solutions and KTP laser irradiation on apical leakage: an electrochemical study. Kuştarci A; Arslan D; Kaya B Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Sep; 70(5):377-83. PubMed ID: 21936720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cleaning of flattened root canals with different irrigating solutions and nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. Arruda MP; Carvalho Junior JR; Miranda CE; Paschoalato C; Silva SR Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(4):284-9. PubMed ID: 20069250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, citric acid and phosphoric acid in calcium hydroxide removal from the root canal: a microscopic cleanliness evaluation. da Silva JM; Silveira A; Santos E; Prado L; Pessoa OF Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):820-4. PubMed ID: 22099858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cleanliness and erosion of root canal walls after irrigation with a new HEDP-based solution vs. traditional sodium hypochlorite followed by EDTA. A scanning electron microscope study. Kfir A; Goldenberg C; Metzger Z; Hülsmann M; Baxter S Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Oct; 24(10):3699-3706. PubMed ID: 32418013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. van der Sluis LW; Versluis M; Wu MK; Wesselink PR Int Endod J; 2007 Jun; 40(6):415-26. PubMed ID: 17442017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]