239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24651499)
41. Facile and efficient reprogramming of ciliary body epithelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells.
Ni A; Wu MJ; Nakanishi Y; Chavala SH
Stem Cells Dev; 2013 Sep; 22(18):2543-50. PubMed ID: 23635313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from orangutan skin fibroblasts.
Ramaswamy K; Yik WY; Wang XM; Oliphant EN; Lu W; Shibata D; Ryder OA; Hacia JG
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Oct; 8():577. PubMed ID: 26475477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Conversion of monkey fibroblasts to transplantable telencephalic neuroepithelial stem cells.
Ai Z; Xiang Z; Li Y; Liu G; Wang H; Zheng Y; Qiu X; Zhao S; Zhu X; Li Y; Ji W; Li T
Biomaterials; 2016 Jan; 77():53-65. PubMed ID: 26584346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) provides a metabolic barrier to reprogramming somatic cells into stem cells.
Vazquez-Martin A; Vellon L; Quirós PM; Cufí S; Ruiz de Galarreta E; Oliveras-Ferraros C; Martin AG; Martin-Castillo B; López-Otín C; Menendez JA
Cell Cycle; 2012 Mar; 11(5):974-89. PubMed ID: 22333578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of the Efficiency of Viral Transduction and Episomal Transfection in Human Fibroblast Reprogramming.
Vdovin AS; Lupatov AY; Kholodenko IV; Yarygin KN
Bull Exp Biol Med; 2015 Nov; 160(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 26593412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Reprogramming of human fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells under xeno-free conditions.
Rodríguez-Pizà I; Richaud-Patin Y; Vassena R; González F; Barrero MJ; Veiga A; Raya A; Izpisúa Belmonte JC
Stem Cells; 2010 Jan; 28(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 19890879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Induced pluripotent stem cells from goat fibroblasts.
Song H; Li H; Huang M; Xu D; Gu C; Wang Z; Dong F; Wang F
Mol Reprod Dev; 2013 Dec; 80(12):1009-17. PubMed ID: 24123501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Adenoviral gene delivery can reprogram human fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells.
Zhou W; Freed CR
Stem Cells; 2009 Nov; 27(11):2667-74. PubMed ID: 19697349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Using Oct4:MerCreMer Lineage Tracing to Monitor Endogenous Oct4 Expression During the Reprogramming of Fibroblasts into Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs).
Greder LV; Post J; Dutton JR
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1357():97-110. PubMed ID: 25687297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Reprogrammed mouse astrocytes retain a "memory" of tissue origin and possess more tendencies for neuronal differentiation than reprogrammed mouse embryonic fibroblasts.
Tian C; Wang Y; Sun L; Ma K; Zheng JC
Protein Cell; 2011 Feb; 2(2):128-40. PubMed ID: 21380643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Intermediate Standstill Clones Trapped in the Reprogramming of Human Fibroblasts to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Zhang L; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Wang L; Huang H
Cell Reprogram; 2020 Apr; 22(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 32182120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Use of a synthetic xeno-free culture substrate for induced pluripotent stem cell induction and retinal differentiation.
Tucker BA; Anfinson KR; Mullins RF; Stone EM; Young MJ
Stem Cells Transl Med; 2013 Jan; 2(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 23283489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Critical POU domain residues confer Oct4 uniqueness in somatic cell reprogramming.
Jin W; Wang L; Zhu F; Tan W; Lin W; Chen D; Sun Q; Xia Z
Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():20818. PubMed ID: 26877091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Human transcription factors responsive to initial reprogramming predominantly undergo legitimate reprogramming during fibroblast conversion to iPSCs.
Cevallos RR; Edwards YJK; Parant JM; Yoder BK; Hu K
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19710. PubMed ID: 33184372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Spermatogonial stem cells and progenitors are refractory to reprogramming to pluripotency by the transcription factors Oct3/4, c-Myc, Sox2 and Klf4.
Corbineau S; Lassalle B; Givelet M; Souissi-Sarahoui I; Firlej V; Romeo PH; Allemand I; Riou L; Fouchet P
Oncotarget; 2017 Feb; 8(6):10050-10063. PubMed ID: 28052023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. c-Myc is dispensable for direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts.
Wernig M; Meissner A; Cassady JP; Jaenisch R
Cell Stem Cell; 2008 Jan; 2(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 18371415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Characterization of bovine induced pluripotent stem cells by lentiviral transduction of reprogramming factor fusion proteins.
Cao H; Yang P; Pu Y; Sun X; Yin H; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Li Y; Liu Y; Fang F; Zhang Z; Tao Y; Zhang X
Int J Biol Sci; 2012; 8(4):498-511. PubMed ID: 22457605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Optimization of culture conditions for maintaining porcine induced pluripotent stem cells.
Gao Y; Guo Y; Duan A; Cheng D; Zhang S; Wang H
DNA Cell Biol; 2014 Jan; 33(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 24256201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into epiblast stem cells.
Han DW; Greber B; Wu G; Tapia N; Araúzo-Bravo MJ; Ko K; Bernemann C; Stehling M; Schöler HR
Nat Cell Biol; 2011 Jan; 13(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 21131959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Reprogramming of somatic cells to induced neural stem cells.
Shahbazi E; Mirakhori F; Ezzatizadeh V; Baharvand H
Methods; 2018 Jan; 133():21-28. PubMed ID: 28939501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
