These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24651595)

  • 1. Cellular mechanoadaptation to substrate mechanical properties: contributions of substrate stiffness and thickness to cell stiffness measurements using AFM.
    Vichare S; Sen S; Inamdar MM
    Soft Matter; 2014 Feb; 10(8):1174-81. PubMed ID: 24651595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of micromechanical properties of hard sphere filled composite hydrogels by atomic force microscopy and finite element simulations.
    Tang G; Galluzzi M; Biswas CS; Stadler FJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Feb; 78():496-504. PubMed ID: 29248847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probing cellular mechanoadaptation using cell-substrate de-adhesion dynamics: experiments and model.
    S S S; Sthanam LK; Padinhateeri R; Inamdar MM; Sen S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106915. PubMed ID: 25197799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of local and global elastic moduli of valve interstitial cells cultured on soft substrates.
    Liu H; Sun Y; Simmons CA
    J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1967-71. PubMed ID: 23746597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined influence of substrate stiffness and surface topography on the antiadhesive properties of Acr-sP(EO-stat-PO) hydrogels.
    Schulte VA; Diez M; Hu Y; Möller M; Lensen MC
    Biomacromolecules; 2010 Dec; 11(12):3375-83. PubMed ID: 21033738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of time-dependent deformation of viscoelastic hydrogels on myogenic induction and Rac1 activity in mesenchymal stem cells.
    Cameron AR; Frith JE; Gomez GA; Yap AS; Cooper-White JJ
    Biomaterials; 2014 Feb; 35(6):1857-68. PubMed ID: 24331708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of cell Young's modulus of adherent cells probed by optical and magnetic tweezers: influence of cell thickness and bead immersion.
    Kamgoué A; Ohayon J; Tracqui P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Aug; 129(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 17655473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Photocrosslinked nanocomposite hydrogels from PEG and silica nanospheres: structural, mechanical and cell adhesion characteristics.
    Gaharwar AK; Rivera C; Wu CJ; Chan BK; Schmidt G
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2013 Apr; 33(3):1800-7. PubMed ID: 23827639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of finite thickness and stiffness on cellular adhesion-induced deformation of compliant substrata.
    Maloney JM; Walton EB; Bruce CM; Van Vliet KJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Oct; 78(4 Pt 1):041923. PubMed ID: 18999471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probing mechanical adaptation of neurite outgrowth on a hydrogel material using atomic force microscopy.
    Jiang FX; Lin DC; Horkay F; Langrana NA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Feb; 39(2):706-13. PubMed ID: 21063777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation of red blood cell mechanical properties using AFM indentation and coarse-grained particle method.
    Barns S; Balanant MA; Sauret E; Flower R; Saha S; Gu Y
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Dec; 16(1):140. PubMed ID: 29258590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A nonintrusive method of measuring the local mechanical properties of soft hydrogels using magnetic microneedles.
    Chippada U; Yurke B; Georges PC; Langrana NA
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Feb; 131(2):021014. PubMed ID: 19102573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence and interactions of substrate thickness, organization and dimensionality on cell morphology and migration.
    Feng CH; Cheng YC; Chao PH
    Acta Biomater; 2013 Mar; 9(3):5502-10. PubMed ID: 23201017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Collective Cell Behavior in Mechanosensing of Substrate Thickness.
    Tusan CG; Man YH; Zarkoob H; Johnston DA; Andriotis OG; Thurner PJ; Yang S; Sander EA; Gentleman E; Sengers BG; Evans ND
    Biophys J; 2018 Jun; 114(11):2743-2755. PubMed ID: 29874622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling mechanosensing and its effect on the migration and proliferation of adherent cells.
    Moreo P; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M
    Acta Biomater; 2008 May; 4(3):613-21. PubMed ID: 18180207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined strategies for optimal detection of the contact point in AFM force-indentation curves obtained on thin samples and adherent cells.
    Gavara N
    Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():21267. PubMed ID: 26891762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A biphasic model for micro-indentation of a hydrogel-based contact lens.
    Chen X; Dunn AC; Sawyer WG; Sarntinoranont M
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Apr; 129(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 17408320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interplay of cell adhesion matrix stiffness and cell type for non-viral gene delivery.
    Chu C; Kong H
    Acta Biomater; 2012 Jul; 8(7):2612-9. PubMed ID: 22510404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of biological cell properties using dynamic indentation measurement.
    Cao G; Chandra N
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 Feb; 81(2 Pt 1):021924. PubMed ID: 20365612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-dependent cellular morphogenesis and matrix stiffening in proteolytically responsive hydrogels.
    Kesselman D; Kossover O; Mironi-Harpaz I; Seliktar D
    Acta Biomater; 2013 Aug; 9(8):7630-9. PubMed ID: 23624218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.