These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24653610)

  • 1. Smear layer and debris removal using manual Ni-Ti files compared with rotary Protaper Ni- Ti files - An In-Vitro SEM study.
    Reddy JM; Latha P; Gowda B; Manvikar V; Vijayalaxmi DB; Ponangi KC
    J Int Oral Health; 2014 Feb; 6(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 24653610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Smear Layer Evaluation on Root Canal Preparation with Manual and Rotary Techniques using EDTA as an Irrigant: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Manjunatha M; Annapurna K; Sudhakar V; Sunil Kumar V; Hiremath VK; Shah A
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Feb; 5(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 24155580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparative SEM Investigation of Smear Layer Remaining on Dentinal Walls by Three Rotary NiTi Files with Different Cross Sectional Designs in Moderately Curved Canals.
    Sharma G; Kakkar P; Vats A
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Mar; 9(3):ZC43-7. PubMed ID: 25954704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Scanning electron microscopy investigation of canal cleaning after canal preparation with nickel titanium files].
    Brkanić T; Ivana S; Vukoje K; Zivković S
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2010; 138(9-10):551-6. PubMed ID: 21180083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Influence of Nickel-Titanium (Ni-Ti) Rotary Instrument Systems on Debris and Smear Layer Formation in Endodontic Procedures: An In Vitro Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Mali S; Patil A; Sharma D; Jaiswal H; Saoji HA; Sinha A; Singh R
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54310. PubMed ID: 38496119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study.
    Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of Rotary Endodontic Instruments on Smear Layer Removal in Root Canals of Primary Teeth: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Subramaniam P; Girish Babu KL; Tabrez TA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 26950816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy using Four Novel Nickel-titanium Rotary Instruments: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
    Kar PP; Khasnis SA; Kidiyoor KH
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Dec; 18(12):1135-1143. PubMed ID: 29208788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of cleaning ability of two rotary instrument systems: Mtwo and ProTaper® universal. An in vitro scanning electron microscopic study.
    Severino M; Libonati A; Di Taranto V; Montemurro E; Campanella V
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2019; 33(3 Suppl. 1):51-61. DENTAL SUPPLEMENT. PubMed ID: 31538450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.
    Liu SB; Fan B; Cheung GS; Peng B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Song YL; Fu Q; Bian Z
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 17212077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Appearance of the root canal walls after preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
    Prati C; Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2004 Jun; 8(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 14760541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of influence of different manufacturing methods on the cleaning efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium files.
    Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
    Microsc Res Tech; 2013 Mar; 76(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 23180471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cleaning Effectiveness of Three NiTi Rotary Instruments: A Focus on Biomaterial Properties.
    Poggio C; Dagna A; Chiesa M; Beltrami R; Bianchi S
    J Funct Biomater; 2015 Feb; 6(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 25692796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of dentinal crack propagation, amount of gutta percha remaining and time required during removal of gutta percha using two different rotary instruments and hand instruments - An
    Tejaswi S; Singh A; Manglekar S; Ambikathanaya UK; Shetty S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Apr; 25(4):524-530. PubMed ID: 35439914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shaping potential of manual NiTi K-File and rotary ProTaper and analyzing the final outcome of shaped canals using CT.
    Kakar S; Dhingra A; Sharma H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):451-5. PubMed ID: 24171988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Aktı A; Tuncay Ö; Dinçer AN; Düzgün S; Topçuoğlu G
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2066-9. PubMed ID: 25443282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.