These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24653671)
1. Consequences of EEG electrode position error on ultimate beamformer source reconstruction performance. Dalal SS; Rampp S; Willomitzer F; Ettl S Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():42. PubMed ID: 24653671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhancement of deep epileptiform activity in the EEG via 3-D adaptive spatial filtering. Ward DM; Jones RD; Bones PJ; Carroll GJ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Jun; 46(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 10356877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Photogrammetry-Based Head Digitization for Rapid and Accurate Localization of EEG Electrodes and MEG Fiducial Markers Using a Single Digital SLR Camera. Clausner T; Dalal SS; Crespo-García M Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():264. PubMed ID: 28559791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using a structured-light 3D scanner to improve EEG source modeling with more accurate electrode positions. Homölle S; Oostenveld R J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Oct; 326():108378. PubMed ID: 31376413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Head Model Simplification on Beamformer Source Localization. Neugebauer F; Möddel G; Rampp S; Burger M; Wolters CH Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():625. PubMed ID: 29209157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial localization of EEG electrodes using 3D scanning. Taberna GA; Marino M; Ganzetti M; Mantini D J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026020. PubMed ID: 30634182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method. Györfi O; Ip CT; Justesen AB; Gam-Jensen ML; Rømer C; Fabricius M; Pinborg LH; Beniczky S Clin Neurophysiol Pract; 2022; 7():135-138. PubMed ID: 35620351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Source-space ICA for EEG source separation, localization, and time-course reconstruction. Jonmohamadi Y; Poudel G; Innes C; Jones R Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():720-37. PubMed ID: 25108125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accurate digitization of EEG electrode locations by electromagnetic tracking system: The proposed head rotation method and comparison against optical system. Kaneko N; Yokoyama M; Nakazawa K; Yokoyama H MethodsX; 2024 Jun; 12():102766. PubMed ID: 38808097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian Algorithm Based Localization of EEG Recorded Electromagnetic Brain Activity. Jatoi MA; Kamel N; Musavi SHA; López JD Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 31975664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of anatomical constraints with MEG beamformers. Hillebrand A; Barnes GR Neuroimage; 2003 Dec; 20(4):2302-13. PubMed ID: 14683731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci. Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement error using a SeeMaLab structured light 3D scanner against a Microscribe 3D digitizer. Messer D; Svendsen MS; Galatius A; Olsen MT; Dahl VA; Conradsen K; Dahl AB PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11804. PubMed ID: 34484981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]