167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24654879)
1. Quantitative and morphologic change associated with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Comparison of 3.0T MRI to external measures.
Gardner GC; Nickerson JP; Watts R; Nelson L; Dittus KL; O'Brien PJ
Lymphat Res Biol; 2014 Jun; 12(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 24654879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.
Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J
Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.
Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU
Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.
Ridner SH; Montgomery LD; Hepworth JT; Stewart BR; Armer JM
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17539463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume.
Sander AP; Hajer NM; Hemenway K; Miller AC
Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1201-12. PubMed ID: 12444879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm.
Adriaenssens N; Buyl R; Lievens P; Fontaine C; Lamote J
Lymphology; 2013 Sep; 46(3):132-43. PubMed ID: 24645536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Assessment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphoedema Tissue Composition.
Borri M; Gordon KD; Hughes JC; Scurr ED; Koh DM; Leach MO; Mortimer PS; Schmidt MA
Invest Radiol; 2017 Sep; 52(9):554-561. PubMed ID: 28538023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of upper extremity exercise on secondary lymphedema in breast cancer patients: a pilot study.
McKenzie DC; Kalda AL
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Feb; 21(3):463-6. PubMed ID: 12560436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation among bioimpedance analysis, sonographic and circumferential measurement in assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema.
Choi YH; Seo KS
Lymphology; 2014 Sep; 47(3):123-33. PubMed ID: 25420305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Self-measurement of upper extremity volume in women post-breast cancer: reliability and validity study.
Mori T; Lustman A; Katz-Leurer M
Physiother Theory Pract; 2015 May; 31(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 25539094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perometry versus simulated circumferential tape measurement for the detection of breast cancer-related lymphedema.
Sun F; Hall A; Tighe MP; Brunelle CL; Sayegh HE; Gillespie TC; Daniell KM; Taghian AG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Nov; 172(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 30062571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.
Czerniec SA; Ward LC; Refshauge KM; Beith J; Lee MJ; York S; Kilbreath SL
Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19916749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative comparison between the laser scanner three-dimensional method and the circumferential method for evaluation of arm volume in patients with lymphedema.
Cau N; Galli M; Cimolin V; Grossi A; Battarin I; Puleo G; Balzarini A; Caraceni A
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2018 Jan; 6(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 29248110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgery.
Sagen A; Kåresen R; Skaane P; Risberg MA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 May; 90(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 19406300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental and Analytical Comparisons of Tissue Dielectric Constant (TDC) and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BIS) in Assessment of Early Arm Lymphedema in Breast Cancer Patients after Axillary Surgery and Radiotherapy.
Lahtinen T; Seppälä J; Viren T; Johansson K
Lymphat Res Biol; 2015 Sep; 13(3):176-85. PubMed ID: 26305554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An infrared 3D scanning device as a novel limb volume measurement tool in breast cancer patients.
White BN; Lu IM; Kao LS; Dixon JB; Weiler MJ; Frank ND; Binkley J; Subhedar P; Okoli J; Buhariwalla K; Suarez-Ligon A; Gabram-Mendola SGA
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 18(1):278. PubMed ID: 33109204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: A new gold standard for arm volume measurements.
Damstra RJ; Glazenburg EJ; Hop WC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 16752072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer.
Megens AM; Harris SR; Kim-Sing C; McKenzie DC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 82(12):1639-44. PubMed ID: 11733875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of breast cancer-related lymphedema on the ability to perform upper extremity activities of daily living.
O'Toole JA; Ferguson CM; Swaroop MN; Horick N; Skolny MN; Brunelle CL; Miller CL; Jammallo LS; Specht MC; Taghian AG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Apr; 150(2):381-8. PubMed ID: 25749734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymphedema evaluation using noninvasive 3T MR lymphangiography.
Crescenzi R; Donahue PMC; Hartley KG; Desai AA; Scott AO; Braxton V; Mahany H; Lants SK; Donahue MJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Nov; 46(5):1349-1360. PubMed ID: 28245075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
