324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24654941)
1. Long-term results of surgically assisted maxillary protraction vs regular facemask.
Nevzatoğlu S; Küçükkeleş N
Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1002-9. PubMed ID: 24654941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term results of surgically-assisted maxillary protraction.
Nevzatoğlu S; Küçükkeleş N
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 24968642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid maxillary expansion compared to surgery for assistance in maxillary face mask protraction.
Küçükkeleş N; Nevzatoğlu S; Koldaş T
Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 20936953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corticotomy-assisted maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and Class III elastics.
Yilmaz HN; Garip H; Satilmis T; Kucukkeles N
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 24913740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study.
Masucci C; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Defraia E
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Nov; 17(4):259-69. PubMed ID: 25041370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion combined with chincup protraction followed by fixed appliances.
Palma JC; Tejedor-Sanz N; Oteo MD; Alarcón JA
Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24892796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.
Hino CT; Cevidanes LH; Nguyen TT; De Clerck HJ; Franchi L; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):705-14. PubMed ID: 24182587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of double-plate appliance/facemask combination and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions.
Gencer D; Kaygisiz E; Yüksel S; Tortop T
Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 24913739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: a long-term controlled study.
Masucci C; Franchi L; Defraia E; Mucedero M; Cozza P; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 21967936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional alterations in pharyngeal airway and maxillary sinus volumes in Class III maxillary deficiency subjects undergoing orthopedic facemask treatment.
Pamporakis P; Nevzatoğlu Ş; Küçükkeleş N
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):701-7. PubMed ID: 24417494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term stability of Class III treatment: rapid palatal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort I maxillary advancement osteotomy.
Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Janisse FN; Bayirli B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e9-19. PubMed ID: 17208098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The short-term treatment effects of face mask therapy in Class III patients based on the anchorage device: miniplates vs rapid maxillary expansion.
Lee NK; Yang IH; Baek SH
Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 22264134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.
Liu W; Zhou Y; Wang X; Liu D; Zhou S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 26432320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of face mask treatment with and without rapid maxillary expansion in young adult subjects.
Halicioglu K; Yavuz I; Ceylan I; Erdem A
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):853-61. PubMed ID: 24628408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.
Cevidanes L; Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA; De Clerck H
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):799-806. PubMed ID: 20578848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the effects of face mask treatment started simultaneously and after the completion of the alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction procedure.
Canturk BH; Celikoglu M
Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 25017013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients. Hyrax versus transverse sagittal maxillary expander: a cephalometric investigation.
Farronato G; Maspero C; Esposito L; Briguglio E; Farronato D; Giannini L
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 21059876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Hybrid Hyrax Distalizer, a new all-in-one appliance for rapid palatal expansion, early class III treatment and upper molar distalization.
Wilmes B; Ludwig B; Katyal V; Nienkemper M; Rein A; Drescher D
J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S47-53. PubMed ID: 25138366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
