798 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24657031)
21. [Efficacy comparison between two-field and three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
Lin D; Ye T; Ma L; Shao L; Song Z; Jiang S; Xiang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):990-994. PubMed ID: 27680065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Incidence and management of chylothorax after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus.
Brinkmann S; Schroeder W; Junggeburth K; Gutschow CA; Bludau M; Hoelscher AH; Leers JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 May; 151(5):1398-404. PubMed ID: 26936011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Gao Y; Wang Y; Chen L; Zhao Y
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2011 Mar; 12(3):366-9. PubMed ID: 21186282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy (MIILE): A Single-Center Experience.
Wang J; Xu MQ; Xie MR; Mei XY
Indian J Surg; 2017 Aug; 79(4):319-325. PubMed ID: 28827906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An audit of surgical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Goan YG; Chang HC; Hsu HK; Chou YP
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Mar; 31(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 17222561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation.
Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY; McCarter MD; Phillips JD; DeCamp MM; Sherman KL; Ko CY; Bentrem DJ
Arch Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(11):1009-16. PubMed ID: 23165615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Early outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) Ivor Lewis operation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the extracorporeal anastomosis technique.
Kim K; Park JS; Seo H
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Jun; 23(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 23751997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for intrathoracic esophageal cancer.
Osugi H; Takemura M; Lee S; Nishikawa T; Fukuhara K; Iwasaki H; Higashino M
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 11(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 16148867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations.
Nguyen NT; Hinojosa MW; Smith BR; Chang KJ; Gray J; Hoyt D
Ann Surg; 2008 Dec; 248(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 19092354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: Propensity-matched comparative analysis.
Bonavina L; Scolari F; Aiolfi A; Bonitta G; Sironi A; Saino G; Asti E
Surgery; 2016 Apr; 159(4):1073-81. PubMed ID: 26422764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Extent of lymphnode dissection with minimally invasive esophageal resection].
Böttger T; Terzic A; Müller M
Zentralbl Chir; 2006 Dec; 131(6):466-73. PubMed ID: 17206565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.
Salem AI; Thau MR; Strom TJ; Abbott AM; Saeed N; Almhanna K; Hoffe SE; Shridhar R; Karl RC; Meredith KL
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27149640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of short-term outcomes following minimally invasive versus open Sweet esophagectomy for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.
Sun X; Wang G; Liu C; Xiong R; Wu H; Xie M; Xu S
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Jun; 11(6):1487-1494. PubMed ID: 32239662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.
Zhao Y; Jiao W; Zhao J; Wang X; Luo Y; Wang Y
Indian J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51 Suppl 2():e25-8. PubMed ID: 25712837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Tapias LF; Morse CR
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 21967644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with two-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus].
Wu J; Chai Y; Zhou XM; Chen QX; Yan FL
Ai Zheng; 2007 Mar; 26(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 17355797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial.
Li B; Xiang J; Zhang Y; Li H; Zhang J; Sun Y; Hu H; Miao L; Ma L; Luo X; Chen S; Ye T; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Chen H
JAMA Surg; 2015 Apr; 150(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 25650816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Abdominothoracic esophageal resection according to Ivor Lewis with intrathoracic anastomosis : standardized totally minimally invasive technique].
Runkel N; Walz M; Ketelhut M
Chirurg; 2015 May; 86(5):468-75. PubMed ID: 24994588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
