These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24657302)

  • 21. [Cost-effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with PEG-rhG-CSF in early-stage breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in China].
    Xia W; Wang SS; Hu H; Zhao FL; Xu F; Hong RX; Jiang KK; Yuan ZY; Shi YX; Zhao K; Huang JJ; Xue C; Bi XW; Lu QY; An X; Zhang JM
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 42(10):861-867. PubMed ID: 33113628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Primary Prophylaxis With Biosimilar Filgrastim for Patients at Intermediate Risk for Febrile Neutropenia: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Li E; Mezzio DJ; Campbell D; Campbell K; Lyman GH
    JCO Oncol Pract; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1235-e1245. PubMed ID: 33793342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cost-utility analysis of primary prophylaxis versus secondary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with diffuse aggressive lymphoma receiving curative-intent chemotherapy.
    Chan KK; Siu E; Krahn MD; Imrie K; Alibhai SM
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Apr; 30(10):1064-71. PubMed ID: 22393098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer in the United Kingdom.
    Whyte S; Cooper KL; Stevenson MD; Madan J; Akehurst R
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):465-74. PubMed ID: 21669371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cost-effectiveness of primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia with pegfilgrastim in docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil therapy for esophageal cancer.
    Ichimura T; Nomura H; Shimizu H; Machida Y; Suzuki K
    Pharmazie; 2021 Sep; 76(9):450-454. PubMed ID: 34481537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization of cancer patients than filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective United States claims analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF).
    Naeim A; Henk HJ; Becker L; Chia V; Badre S; Li X; Deeter R
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Jan; 13():11. PubMed ID: 23298389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cost effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma and myeloma: an economic evaluation of the PALM Trial.
    Perrier L; Lefranc A; Pérol D; Quittet P; Schmidt-Tanguy A; Siani C; de Peretti C; Favier B; Biron P; Moreau P; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Jardin F; Espinouse D; Sebban C
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 23435861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cost effectiveness of primary pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in patients with breast cancer at risk of febrile neutropenia.
    Aarts MJ; Grutters JP; Peters FP; Mandigers CM; Dercksen MW; Stouthard JM; Nortier HJ; van Laarhoven HW; van Warmerdam LJ; van de Wouw AJ; Jacobs EM; Mattijssen V; van der Rijt CC; Smilde TJ; van der Velden AW; Temizkan M; Batman E; Muller EW; van Gastel SM; Joore MA; Borm GF; Tjan-Heijnen VC
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 31(34):4283-9. PubMed ID: 24166522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review.
    Mitchell S; Li X; Woods M; Garcia J; Hebard-Massey K; Barron R; Samuel M
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 26769697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cost-effectiveness of febrile neutropenia prevention with primary versus secondary G-CSF prophylaxis for adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review.
    Younis T; Rayson D; Jovanovic S; Skedgel C
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Oct; 159(3):425-32. PubMed ID: 27572552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is it reasonable to administer pegfilgrastim on day 1 of a myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimen? A cost-utility analysis.
    Billingsley CC; Cohn DE; Crim AK; Li Q; O'Malley DM; Havrilesky LJ
    Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2018; 14():21-25. PubMed ID: 30104004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors on febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Wang L; Baser O; Kutikova L; Page JH; Barron R
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Nov; 23(11):3131-40. PubMed ID: 25821144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cost-efficiency analyses for the US of biosimilar filgrastim-sndz, reference filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and pegfilgrastim with on-body injector in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia.
    McBride A; Campbell K; Bikkina M; MacDonald K; Abraham I; Balu S
    J Med Econ; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 28722494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
    Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with early discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice.
    Weycker D; Li X; Barron R; Li Y; Reiner M; Kartashov A; Figueredo J; Tzivelekis S; Garcia J
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jun; 24(6):2481-90. PubMed ID: 26670915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of PegaGen
    Jenabian A; Ehsanpour A; Mortazavizadeh SMR; Raafat J; Razavi M; Khosravi A; Seifi S; Salimi B; Anjidani N; Kafi H
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Oct; 30(10):8151-8158. PubMed ID: 35792924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia among patients receiving biweekly (Q2W) chemotherapy regimens: a systematic review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety.
    Mahtani R; Crawford J; Flannery SM; Lawrence T; Schenfeld J; Gawade PL
    BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):621. PubMed ID: 34044798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia by day of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice from 2010 to 2015.
    Weycker D; Bensink M; Lonshteyn A; Doroff R; Chandler D
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2017 Dec; 33(12):2107-2113. PubMed ID: 28958157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    McBride A; Krendyukov A; Mathieson N; Campbell K; Balu S; Natek M; MacDonald K; Abraham I
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 31433700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.