These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24657302)

  • 41. Chemotherapy-associated treatment burden in breast cancer patients receiving lipegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim: secondary efficacy data from a phase III study.
    Gladkov OA; Buchner A; Bias P; Müller U; Elsässer R
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jan; 24(1):395-400. PubMed ID: 26092233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Phase III placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of pegfilgrastim to reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.
    Kosaka Y; Rai Y; Masuda N; Takano T; Saeki T; Nakamura S; Shimazaki R; Ito Y; Tokuda Y; Tamura K
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Apr; 23(4):1137-43. PubMed ID: 25576433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim prophylaxis among patients aged ≥65 years: a retrospective evaluation using Medicare claims.
    Weycker D; Hanau A; Lonshteyn A; Bowers C; Bensink M; Garawin T; Chandler D
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1705-1711. PubMed ID: 29962268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Mądry R; Popławska L; Haslbauer F; Šafanda M; Ghizdavescu D; Benkovicova J; Csőszi T; Mihaylov G; Niepel D; Jaeger C; Frkanova I; Macovei A; Staudigl C
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2016 Apr; 128(7-8):238-47. PubMed ID: 26745973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A modified filgrastim regimen does not reduce pain burden compared to pegfilgrastim in women receiving chemotherapy for non-metastatic breast cancer.
    Leung M; Florendo J; Kano J; Marr-Del Monte T; Higgins B; Myers R; Menon T; Jones G
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Jun; 23(6):1669-77. PubMed ID: 25421443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?
    Weycker D; Li X; Figueredo J; Barron R; Tzivelekis S; Hagiwara M
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 May; 24(5):2309-2316. PubMed ID: 26607482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Pegfilgrastim for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with solid tumors.
    Lambertini M; Ferreira AR; Del Mastro L; Danesi R; Pronzato P
    Expert Opin Biol Ther; 2015; 15(12):1799-817. PubMed ID: 26488491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Use and effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice:a retrospective observational study.
    Weycker D; Doroff R; Hanau A; Bowers C; Belani R; Chandler D; Lonshteyn A; Bensink M; Lyman GH
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Aug; 19(1):792. PubMed ID: 31399079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Potential cost savings from chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with biosimilar filgrastim and expanded access to targeted antineoplastic treatment across the European Union G5 countries: a simulation study.
    Sun D; Andayani TM; Altyar A; MacDonald K; Abraham I
    Clin Ther; 2015 Apr; 37(4):842-57. PubMed ID: 25704107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Economic analysis of prophylactic pegfilgrastim in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
    Eldar-Lissai A; Cosler LE; Culakova E; Lyman GH
    Value Health; 2008; 11(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 18380630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A randomised phase II study of the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim after autologous stem cell transplant for lymphoma and myeloma (PALM study).
    Sebban C; Lefranc A; Perrier L; Moreau P; Espinouse D; Schmidt A; Kammoun L; Ghesquieres H; Ferlay C; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Pérol D; Michallet M; Quittet P
    Eur J Cancer; 2012 Mar; 48(5):713-20. PubMed ID: 22248711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparative effectiveness of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and sargramostim as prophylaxis against hospitalization for neutropenic complications in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.
    Weycker D; Malin J; Barron R; Edelsberg J; Kartashov A; Oster G
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jun; 35(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 21378538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cooper KL; Madan J; Whyte S; Stevenson MD; Akehurst RL
    BMC Cancer; 2011 Sep; 11():404. PubMed ID: 21943360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A novel approach to maintain planned dose chemotherapy on time: a decision-making tool to improve patient care.
    Lyman GH
    Eur J Cancer; 2000 Apr; 36 Suppl 1():S15-21. PubMed ID: 10785605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Two decades of pegfilgrastim: what have we learned? Where do we go from here?
    De Oliveira Brandao C; Lewis S; Sandschafer D; Crawford J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 May; 39(5):707-718. PubMed ID: 36976784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cost-effectiveness analysis of lipegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis in women with breast cancer in Australia: a modelled economic evaluation.
    Gao L; Li SC
    Breast Cancer; 2018 Nov; 25(6):671-680. PubMed ID: 29802592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
    Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effectiveness of daily versus non-daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy: a multivariate analysis of data from current practice.
    Almenar Cubells D; Bosch Roig C; Jiménez Orozco E; Álvarez R; Cuervo JM; Díaz Fernández N; Sánchez Heras AB; Galán Brotons A; Giner Marco V; Codes M De Villena M;
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2013 May; 22(3):400-12. PubMed ID: 23331323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of pegfilgrastim prescribing practice to national guidelines at a university hospital outpatient oncology clinic.
    Waters GE; Corrigan P; Gatesman M; Smith TJ
    J Oncol Pract; 2013 Jul; 9(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 23942922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Therapeutic Use of Filgrastim for Established Febrile Neutropenia Is Cost Effective Among Patients With Solid Tumors and Lymphomas.
    Wang XJ; Tong WX; Chan A
    Clin Ther; 2017 Jun; 39(6):1161-1170. PubMed ID: 28554533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.