These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24658081)

  • 1. Posterior P1 and early frontal negativity reflect developmental changes in attentional distraction during adolescence.
    Zhang W; Li H; Chen J; Chen N; Liu X; Wang D; Shen J
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Jun; 87():30-8. PubMed ID: 24658081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distraction reduces theta synchronization in emotion regulation during adolescence.
    Zhang W; Li X; Liu X; Duan X; Wang D; Shen J
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Aug; 550():81-6. PubMed ID: 23827226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Late positive potentials in affective picture processing during adolescence.
    Zhang W; Lu J; Fang H; Pan X; Zhang J; Wang D
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Feb; 510(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 22269124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Event-related synchronization of delta and beta oscillations reflects developmental changes in the processing of affective pictures during adolescence.
    Zhang W; Lu J; Liu X; Fang H; Li H; Wang D; Shen J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Dec; 90(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 24144638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competition for attentional resources between low spatial frequency content of emotional images and a foreground task in early visual cortex.
    Müller MM; Gundlach C
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Mar; 54(3):429-443. PubMed ID: 27990660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
    Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. See no evil: directing visual attention within unpleasant images modulates the electrocortical response.
    Dunning JP; Hajcak G
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Jan; 46(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 18992071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotional event-related potentials are reduced if negative pictures presented at fixation are unattended.
    Wiens S; Sand A; Norberg J; Andersson P
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 495(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 21435375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The late positive potential predicts subsequent interference with target processing.
    Weinberg A; Hajcak G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):2994-3007. PubMed ID: 21268668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developmental changes in point-light walker processing during childhood and adolescence: an event-related potential study.
    Hirai M; Watanabe S; Honda Y; Kakigi R
    Neuroscience; 2009 Jun; 161(1):311-25. PubMed ID: 19303916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Affective picture modulation: valence, arousal, attention allocation and motivational significance.
    Leite J; Carvalho S; Galdo-Alvarez S; Alves J; Sampaio A; Gonçalves OF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 22226675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Late positive potential to appetitive stimuli and local attentional bias.
    Gable PA; Harmon-Jones E
    Emotion; 2010 Jun; 10(3):441-6. PubMed ID: 20515232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early and late temporo-spatial effects of contextual interference during perception of facial affect.
    Frühholz S; Fehr T; Herrmann M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19470392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emotional intensity influences pre-implementation and implementation of distraction and reappraisal.
    Shafir R; Schwartz N; Blechert J; Sheppes G
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 10(10):1329-37. PubMed ID: 25700568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Snake pictures draw more early attention than spider pictures in non-phobic women: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Van Strien JW; Eijlers R; Franken IH; Huijding J
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Feb; 96():150-7. PubMed ID: 24374241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional load of the primary task influences the frontal but not the temporal generators of mismatch negativity.
    Restuccia D; Della Marca G; Marra C; Rubino M; Valeriani M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):891-9. PubMed ID: 16289727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Directed attention reduces processing of emotional distracters irrespective of valence and arousal level.
    Wiens S; Syrjänen E
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 23669534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Harm avoidance in adolescents modulates late positive potentials during affective picture processing.
    Zhang W; Lu J; Ni Z; Liu X; Wang D; Shen J
    Int J Dev Neurosci; 2013 Aug; 31(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 23542131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporospatial analysis of explicit and implicit processing of negative content during word comprehension.
    Hinojosa JA; Albert J; López-Martín S; Carretié L
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Jun; 87():109-21. PubMed ID: 24732955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological evidence of early attentional bias to drug-related pictures in chronic cannabis users.
    Asmaro D; Carolan PL; Liotti M
    Addict Behav; 2014 Jan; 39(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 24126204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.