These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24658235)

  • 41. An application of symbolic dynamics for FHRV assessment.
    Cesarelli M; Romano M; Bifulco P; Improta G; D'Addio G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():123-7. PubMed ID: 22874165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Quantitative assessment of fetal well-being through CTG recordings: a new parameter based on phase-rectified signal average.
    Fanelli A; Magenes G; Campanile M; Signorini MG
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2013 Sep; 17(5):959-66. PubMed ID: 25055375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sensitivity and specificity of intrapartum computerised FIGO criteria for cardiotocography and fetal scalp pH during labour: multicentre, observational study.
    Schiermeier S; Pildner von Steinburg S; Thieme A; Reinhard J; Daumer M; Scholz M; Hatzmann W; Schneider KT
    BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1557-63. PubMed ID: 18752587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Marked fetal acidosis and specific changes in power spectrum analysis of fetal heart rate variability recorded during the last hour of labour.
    Siira SM; Ojala TH; Vahlberg TJ; Jalonen JO; Välimäki IA; Rosén KG; Ekholm EM
    BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):418-23. PubMed ID: 15777438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Computerized analysis of normal fetal heart rate pattern throughout gestation.
    Serra V; Bellver J; Moulden M; Redman CW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 19489020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Interpretation of Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring in the Clinical Context.
    Holmgren C
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Sep; 63(3):625-634. PubMed ID: 32735415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Classification of foetal heart rate sequences based on fractal features.
    Felgueiras CS; de Sá JP; Bernardes J; Gama S
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1998 Mar; 36(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 9684460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Clinical significance of intermittent sinusoidal fetal heart rate at third trimester].
    Guo XH; Zhang HY; Wang YL; Li HY; Liang HP
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May; 46(5):342-4. PubMed ID: 21733369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Computer-assisted analysis of intrapartum cardiotocodynagraphs].
    Roemer VM
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2002 Jun; 124(6):317-25. PubMed ID: 12384817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. SisPorto 4.0 - computer analysis following the 2015 FIGO Guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Rei M; Nunes I; Sousa P; Bernardes J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jan; 30(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 26940372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Denoising of the fetal heart rate signal with non-linear filtering of the wavelet transform maxima.
    Papadimitriou S; Gatzounas D; Papadopoulos V; Tzigounis V; Bezerianos A
    Int J Med Inform; 1997 May; 44(3):177-92. PubMed ID: 9291009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. ACOG Practice Bulletin. No. 62: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):1161-9. PubMed ID: 15863569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis in labor: detection of intervals with un-assignable baseline.
    Georgieva A; Payne SJ; Moulden M; Redman CW
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Oct; 32(10):1549-60. PubMed ID: 21862845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Influence of fetal acidemia on fetal heart rate analyzed by computerized cardiotocography in pregnancies with placental insufficiency.
    Maeda Mde F; Nomura RM; Niigaki JI; Francisco RP; Zugaib M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Dec; 26(18):1820-4. PubMed ID: 23650952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Is intrapartum vibroacoustic stimulation an effective predictor of fetal acidosis?
    Lin CC; Vassallo B; Mittendorf R
    J Perinat Med; 2001; 29(6):506-12. PubMed ID: 11776681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Panel data analysis of cardiotocograph (CTG) data.
    Horio H; Kikuchi H; Ikeda T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1041. PubMed ID: 23920815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Antepartum fetal heart rate feature extraction and classification using empirical mode decomposition and support vector machine.
    Krupa N; Ali M; Zahedi E; Ahmed S; Hassan FM
    Biomed Eng Online; 2011 Jan; 10():6. PubMed ID: 21244712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The performance and reliability of wavelet denoising for Doppler ultrasound fetal heart rate signal preprocessing.
    Papadimitriou S; Papadopoulos V; Gatzounas D; Tzigounis V; Bezerianos A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():561-5. PubMed ID: 10179728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Pre-pathologic-pathologic cardiotocographic pattern in second stage of labor. Analysis of the incidence of acidosis and recommendations for fetal blood gas analysis].
    Schlotter CM
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 9173769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A risk stratification model to predict adverse neonatal outcome in labor.
    Holmgren CM; Esplin MS; Jackson M; Porter TF; Henry E; Horne BD; Varner MW
    J Perinatol; 2013 Dec; 33(12):914-8. PubMed ID: 24157496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.